Bucky_Hoyt
Registered User
yes, whatever wikipedia says MUST be the truth...
yes, whatever wikipedia says MUST be the truth...
I think you're being overly generous with the 70% figure in regards to Florida. What I wouldn't give to find the actual, bona-fide, God's honest average attendence for their games. I'm talking about the number of bodies in the seats night in and night out. Anyone who's watched one of their games knows that it isn't even close to the announced attendance. As a Penguins fan I was shocked when they played down there. Exciting team coming in, two of the great stars in the league...and an embarrassing dearth of fans at the game.
Quebec isn't selling out the WC's, they didn't sell out the Memorial Cup and they barely ever sold out for the Nords, some people need to wake up and smell the coffee, Quebec with their market is not attractive to any professional sports league
Quebec isn't selling out the WC's, they didn't sell out the Memorial Cup and they barely ever sold out for the Nords, some people need to wake up and smell the coffee, Quebec with their market is not attractive to any professional sports league
little update;
bettman was in quebec last friday for the WC and I can confirm you that he met the group QuebecLNH (the group who have plans for an arena) to talk about a possible come back of a nhl franchise in quebec. the mayor of st-augustin was also at the meeting.
also, marcel aubut apparently met pierre pagé, ex-coach of the nordiques, who is working for a red bull hockey club in europe to talk about the possibility for red bull to invest for a nhl franchise in quebec...
Bettman has talked to a lot of people in several cities interested in getting a hockey team, whether by expansion or relocation. The fact that he talked to people in Quebec City means nothing ... unless you think that him talking to people in Hamilton, Winnipeg, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Charlotte are similarly noteworthy.
Bettman has talked to a lot of people in several cities interested in getting a hockey team, whether by expansion or relocation. The fact that he talked to people in Quebec City means nothing ... unless you think that him talking to people in Hamilton, Winnipeg, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Charlotte are similarly noteworthy.
Yes. I think that it's a good sign that he talked to a group of Quebec City. If he didn't, that would be a very bad sign IMO. Now, I'm not saying there's a deal and that we'll get a franchise in 2 years; it has nothing to do about that. I think the fact that there was a meeting sends a message that the league is ready to listen what Quebec City has to offer and that we are not forgotten.
Do you know when operation tshirt is set to start? Demi-Final or Final?
Apparently they have to find the manufacturers of the tshirts, and then get government funding to purchase them. Having done that, they're looking for some federal sponsorship money in order to get the appropriate wording onto the tshirts.
Nothing's firm yet, of course, but it should be any day now.
Then it's similarly a good sign for the cities I mentioned above ... correct? In other words, it means nothing until (A) plans for expansion are formally announced, or (B) one of the existing teams announces its intent to look elsewhere.Yes. I think that it's a good sign that he talked to a group of Quebec City. If he didn't, that would be a very bad sign IMO. Now, I'm not saying there's a deal and that we'll get a franchise in 2 years; it has nothing to do about that. I think the fact that there was a meeting sends a message that the league is ready to listen what Quebec City has to offer and that we are not forgotten.
Then it's similarly a good sign for the cities I mentioned above ... correct? In other words, it means nothing until (A) plans for expansion are formally announced, or (B) one of the existing teams announces its intent to look elsewhere.
I can talk to Bettman about a team for Portland, Oregon or Grand Forks, North Dakota or Poplar Bluff, Missouri - but it doesn't mean that any of those cities are getting a team any time soon. The fact that a conversation took place means nothing unless there's action accompanying it - and I don't mean action from the city's POV.
So Bettman talked to them - if he had given them the cold shoulder, how quickly would "BWAAH, BETTMAN HATES CANADA!" been posted here? Talking = talking right now ... nothing more, nothing less. It doesn't mean Quebec City is one step closer or further from getting a franchise.
I have no idea what hints anyone is supposed to draw from this, unless "talking" somehow magically means "we're closer to getting a team" - in which case, see my points above about how K.C, Vegas, Hamilton, Winnipeg, etc. etc. etc. have also talked to him ... which implies that they too are closer to getting a team. When you take a step in front of the person next to you, you're not a step ahead if that person also takes a step forward.
I don't care if there's 457 groups working on it, it's all talk until either there's a formal plan for expansion or one of the existing franchises announces it's intent to possibly leave its current location. Bettman talking to one of those groups neither increases nor decreases the chances of Quebec City getting another team. If you have a statement along the lines of, "Bettman has guaranteed that we're getting a team in the next 3 years", then you can talk about how Quebec City's chances are in fact better - but if a statement like that existed, I'm sure you would have posted it.
So as I said ... it's talk. Nothing more, nothing less - at the end of the day, nothing has changed.
Do you know when operation tshirt is set to start? Demi-Final or Final?
Again ... if it's "part of a *possible* road to such a statement," then the same can [should] be said for every time Bettman talks to someone from a city interested in an NHL team that currently doesn't have one. The fact that Bettman talked to __________ means that it's complete non-event unless some monumental statement was issued - clearly none was issued here, just like none has been issued every other time Bettman has talked to someone from an interested city.
You read way too much into the fact that the two talked, and still want to believe that it means something special - as if Bettman talking to a group or groups from any other city means squat. If you want to continue to read more into it, fine - but you cannot realistically believe that him talking to X number of cities means significantly more for one of them than it does for everyone else. Feel free to speculate as it fits your needs - I prefer to actually wait for actual proof to show up instead of making up my own assumptions, assuming they're true, presenting them as fact, and then drawing conclusions accordingly.
I am not sure but I heard it's for one of the two Demi-Finals.