Halak, to this day, despite the size, is still a very good goalie. Price is a great goalie. So Price is a better goalie. Yet, I still believe that St.Louis would have done a better job with Halak instead of Miller. Easy for me to say I guess but that's how I feel.
My questions, at the time, was always this:
1- What would have been better.....Price and the return for Halak, or Halak and the return of Price. Is Halak that much more weaker so that whatever the return for Price would never be as good as keeping Price?
2-Can we actually know the real value and real quality of a goalie without a great run in the playoffs?
And my point, also at the time, was the the amoutn of pressure on Price could have been way too much for him as we were coming off an incredible Halak performance, a performance we haven't seen for a goalie in quite some time. While, in the end, Price showed a lot of character and was able to overcome all that, may I remind some people that we DID witness the amount of pressure Price was going to get as he was booed in the first preseason game he was playing in? Wasn't that far off about the amount of pressure, what I didn't know, is that he would have been able to overcome that. Wasn't sure at all....he made me eat some crow. But I'm still waiting for a great playoff run à la Quick. True that Quick might have had better teams....but totally untrue that he didn't have to do miracles to win some games. He still did. As of now though, Habs are way too weak on the D to think they'd go far this year. We just can't. I hope we don't throw some of the future out so we'd just acquire 1 guy and think it's enough. It won't be. We would need some Price miracles to go far.