Trading one defenseman would solve our log jam at defense. I just assumed it would be someone like Nielsen from the Marlies…
But trading Carrick is cool too. Preferably with a goalie attached. Then keep Marincin up I think and have Borgman, Rosen and Nielsen on the left side with Liljegren, Holl and Loverde on the right. Subban is the 7th defenseman and rotates in for some "development" time.
Durzi and Hollowell still end up back in the OHL IMO.
I could see the Leafs trading Carrick if they don't think that he has a shot going forward. If they wanted to trade someone like Nielsen instead the only very minor problem with that is that he is still exempt from waivers (and by that I mean that Carrick and Holl are both not - which is where I see the worst log-jam at the moment if the Leafs decide that Ozhiganov is the best fit for their RD 3rd pairing spot).
I would also say that it is extremely likely that the Marlies carry 8 D next year, just as they did for 95% of the season last year. They play a lot of 3-in-3s. Holl requires waivers for the first time this year (obviously Subban and LoVerde do as well) and I don't have a hard time thinking that there might be a team willing to take a chance on Holl.
So if the Leafs were to trade Carrick and keep 8 D on the roster (for instance - Rielly-Hainsey, Gardiner-Zaitsev, Dermott-Ozhiganov, Marincin-Holl) then the depth on the Marlies starts to look thin (for instance - Borgman-Liljegren, Rosen-LoVerde, Nielsen-Subban - that would allow the Marlies to slot Sandin and either Durzi or Hollowell into their lineup using the same development model that they used for Liljegren last year which I would be more than fine with).