Speculation: Predict End of Season Point Totals

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
4,901
4,006
Our record is decent at home already under DJ

Home record: 47-45-14 for an 84 pts pace

Road record: 34-59-10 for a 62 pts pace.
Yes, I knew we were better at home but I expect far better than .500 if DJ deploys our players correctly.

The more we discuss various items about this season the more I am convinced we will make the play-offs. So much room for big chunks of points compared to last season (Covid, schedule, injuries, personnel) and then add in the improvements in other Eastern teams and the top teams probably don't end up at the same point total.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nova Stutzlia

Wallet Inspector

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
5,766
5,010
Stutzle: 85
Debrincat: 82
Batherson: 75
Norris: 71
Tkachuk: 70
Giroux: 65
Pinto: 44
Joseph: 37
Formenton: 35
Kelly: 20
Watson: 17
Kastelic: 15
Gambrell: 10

Chabot: 62
Sanderson: 35
Zub: 31
Brannstrom: 30
Holden: 18
Hamonic: 12
Zaitsev: 10

Maybe some of those are slightly optimistic but screw it, I'm hyped for this season.
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
28,573
9,085
It's obvious that the Sens will score a lot more goals this yr, but they still need to reduce their goals against & hopefully with better goaltending & high scoring forward lines, that will help to reduce the goals against. They really just need to improve their defence a little or their defence naturally gets better because the team as a whole is better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix and Alex1234

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,126
9,694
It's obvious that the Sens will score a lot more goals this yr, but they still need to reduce their goals against & hopefully with better goaltending & high scoring forward lines, that will help to reduce the goals against. They really just need to improve their defence a little or their defence naturally gets better because the team as a whole is better.
We gave up 266 last year which was better than 10 teams. A very modest improvement to 250 puts us in a median position in the league.

We're going to need to score to be competitive at a playoff position level.

We always talk about how bad our D was. We scored 227 which was better than 6 teams and much further away from league median. Our O needs to make a much larger jump than our D to make us competitive
 
Jan 19, 2006
22,965
4,667
Calgary
We gave up 266 last year which was better than 10 teams. A very modest improvement to 250 puts us in a median position in the league.

We're going to need to score to be competitive at a playoff position level.

We always talk about how bad our D was. We scored 227 which was better than 6 teams and much further away from league median. Our O needs to make a much larger jump than our D to make us competitive
They are linked. If we spend less time hemmed in our own zone, we will score more goals.
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,126
9,694
They are linked. If we spend less time hemmed in our own zone, we will score more goals.
This is true

It's also true that if we spend more time in the O zone, we'll give up less. Our top 9 should be significantly better which should result in a lot less pressure in our end
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmix and aragorn

Sweatred

Erase me
Jan 28, 2019
13,408
3,324
Jimmy > Batherson … plus I think Norris line will get a heavier matchup and DJ will give them more defensive starts than Jimmy’s.
 
Last edited:

Korpse

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
20,776
9,615
Stutzle 30G 85 P
Debrincat 38G 76P
Batherson 27G 68P
Tkachuk 34G 66P
Norris 31G 60P
Giroux 16G 55P
Pinto 17G 40P
Formenton 21G 36 P
Joseph 16 G 31P
Kelly 10G 22P
Watson 5G 18P
Gambrell 3G 15P

Chabot 8G 57P
Sanderson 5G 32P
Brannstrom 4G 29P
Zub 4G 26P
Holden 4G 18P
Hamonic 3G 15P
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,784
30,988
I think we might see an explosion in production from Chabot.

Despite being on one of the lower scoring teams at 5v5 over the last 3 seasons, Chabot is 8th in pts per game 5v5 (40+ games min) and 21st for 5v5 goals/gp despite not being know as a goal scoring Dman. Heck, his first two years he had the 4th most 5v5 goals, and 3rd per game.

Now, a lot of his 5v5 icetime will see a drastic improvement in linemates, I could see 5v5 production really increasing. On the PP, which hasn't been his strength, he's going to have a tone more help too, we might see coverage break down more as the opposition has to worry about so many potential triggers.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
36,114
22,066
Visit site
Scoring projections for the Forwards

Stutzle 80-90 points in the 30 goal range
Batherson 70-85 point range (he maybe relegated to the 2nd pp due to his versatility)
Debrincat 65-80 point range 40 goals
Tkachuk 65-80 point range 35-35 type season
Norris 60-75 point range 40 goal potential
Giroux 55-70 point range
Pinto 35-45 point range
Joseph 30-40 point range
Formenton 30-40 point range with 20 goals elite pker 5 + shorties
Kelly 15 goal potential 30 points
Watson 10-15 point range
Gambrell 10-15 point range
Kastelic 10-15 point range with a few fights

Scoring projections for the D

Chabot 50-60
Brannstrom 20-35
Sanderson 20-35
Zub 20-30
Thomson 15-30
Hamonic 10-25
Holden 10-25
Zaitsev 5-10
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,126
9,694
I think the scoring expectations are too high or the playoff expectations are too low.
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
28,573
9,085
I think we might see an explosion in production from Chabot.

Despite being on one of the lower scoring teams at 5v5 over the last 3 seasons, Chabot is 8th in pts per game 5v5 (40+ games min) and 21st for 5v5 goals/gp despite not being know as a goal scoring Dman. Heck, his first two years he had the 4th most 5v5 goals, and 3rd per game.

Now, a lot of his 5v5 icetime will see a drastic improvement in linemates, I could see 5v5 production really increasing. On the PP, which hasn't been his strength, he's going to have a tone more help too, we might see coverage break down more as the opposition has to worry about so many potential triggers.
I think so too & the best way to assure this is to place Chabot with their best defender Zub who can concentrate on the dfensive side & give Chabot the green light to go whenever he can. They have all this offence at forward, they will need someone to get them the puck & that's where Chabot & to a lesser extent Sanderson can get that puck to their forwards & pass that puck around. Brannstrom is also good at that, but he is behind Chabot & Sanderson & Zub & Hamonic are the defensive concience guys to play with those two given the defence roster right now. The 3rd pairing will likely be a defensive shutdown pairing & PK tandem which should also exclude Brann.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,784
30,988
I think the scoring expectations are too high or the playoff expectations are too low.
Well, I can only speak for myself, but I did my projections based on all the players playing 82 games which obviously won't happen. Health tends to be strongly correlated with performance, for seemingly obvious reasons, and while I fully expect us to be healthier than last year, I do think we will probably see se key injuries that will partially determine our fate.

I also expect the east to be really tight, it should be an entertaining season
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert

Cosmix

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 24, 2011
17,873
6,469
Ottawa
It's obvious that the Sens will score a lot more goals this yr, but they still need to reduce their goals against & hopefully with better goaltending & high scoring forward lines, that will help to reduce the goals against. They really just need to improve their defence a little or their defence naturally gets better because the team as a whole is better.
I agree. If the defence was better then I think a playoff spot would be likely. Right now I think the Senators will be a bubble team.

I projected team scoring based on last year's performance and adjusted it to show an increase in goals for Stutzle, and a corresponding decrease in goals for Norris and Debrincat. I made some assumptions regarding games played by each player (not 82 for each player). This would increase the Senators GF to about 3.4 G/GP over the season compared to 2.24 in 2021-22. GA/GP for 2021-22 was 2.64. I think 3.4 is probably too high as it would likely lead to playoff hockey if the GA/GP remains at 2.64.

I forgot to adjust Shane Pinto's scoring as he did not get any goals last year and that will not hold true for 2022-23.

NumberNameProj GoalsProj AssistsProj Points
7​
Brady Tkachuk
30​
37​
67​
19​
Drake Batherson
29​
46​
76​
12​
Alex Debrincat
36​
36​
71​
28​
Claude Giroux
22​
46​
68​
18​
Tim Stutzle
30​
36​
66​
9​
Josh Norris
38​
24​
62​
21​
Mathieu Joseph
14​
21​
34​
10​
Alex Formenton
18​
14​
32​
45​
Parker Kelly
13​
10​
23​
16​
Austin Watson
12​
7​
19​
12​
Shane Pinto
0​
16​
16​
47​
Mark Kastelic
6​
6​
13​
Other Forwards
0​
7​
7​
27​
Dylan Gambrell
2​
3​
4​
72​
Thomas Chabot
9​
40​
50​
2​
Artem Zub
6​
15​
21​
26​
Erik Brannstrom
0​
13​
13​
22​
Nikita Zaitsev
2​
10​
13​
5​
Nick Holden
3​
9​
13​
23​
Travis Hamonic
4​
8​
12​
85​
Jake Sanderson
5​
5​
10​
60​
Lassi Thomson
0​
6​
6​
24​
Jacob Bernard-Docker
0​
3​
3​
 
Last edited:

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
Forwards:

Debrincat: 40 goals, 75 points
Stutzle: 30 goals, 75 points
Batherson: 30 goals, 70 points
Tkachuk: 30 goals, 65 points
Norris: 35 goals, 65 points
Giroux: 20 goals, 55 points
Pinto: 20 goals, 40 points
Joseph: 15 goals, 35 points
Formenton: 20 goals, 35 points
Kelly: 10 goals, 25 points
Watson: 10 goals, 20 points
Gambrell: 5 goals, 15 points
Kastelic: 5 goals, 15 points

Defense:

Chabot: 10 goals, 50 points
Sanderson: 10 goals, 40 points
Brannstrom: 5 goals, 30 points
Zub: 5 goals, 20 points
 

Loach

Registered User
Jun 9, 2021
2,632
1,695
I think so too & the best way to assure this is to place Chabot with their best defender Zub who can concentrate on the dfensive side & give Chabot the green light to go whenever he can. They have all this offence at forward, they will need someone to get them the puck & that's where Chabot & to a lesser extent Sanderson can get that puck to their forwards & pass that puck around. Brannstrom is also good at that, but he is behind Chabot & Sanderson & Zub & Hamonic are the defensive concience guys to play with those two given the defence roster right now. The 3rd pairing will likely be a defensive shutdown pairing & PK tandem which should also exclude Brann.
A shut down pairing doesn't have to be a set pairing all the time does it? Can't DJ just send out Hamonic/Holden/Zub/Chabot at anytime..
 

saskriders

Can't Hold Leads
Sep 11, 2010
25,065
1,607
Calgary
Stü: 85 points
DeBrincat: 47 goals
Norris: 43 goals
Tkachuk: 78 points
Batherson: 80 points
Giroux: 69 points

Too lazy to do more.
 

pown

We are team
Oct 12, 2013
1,301
1,374
Ottawa
Batherson - 32 G 84 P
Tkachuk - 33 G 72 P
Stutzle - 29 G 78 P
Chabot - 14 G 43 P
DeBrincat- 42 G 87 P
Norris - 40 G 75 P
Giroux - 24 G 75 P
Formenton - 16 G 42 P
Joseph - 22 G 44 P
Pinto - 18 G 48 P
Sanderson - 9 G 33 P
Zub - 4 G 17 P
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,126
9,694
Well, I can only speak for myself, but I did my projections based on all the players playing 82 games which obviously won't happen. Health tends to be strongly correlated with performance, for seemingly obvious reasons, and while I fully expect us to be healthier than last year, I do think we will probably see se key injuries that will partially determine our fate.

I also expect the east to be really tight, it should be an entertaining season
So we were 227gf and 266ga last year. As you pointed out previously, once we got over the start, we paced at 85 points over 60+ games. So what's indicative of the team? The start or the 60+ games.

I think it is the 60+ games. Improving that pace by 10 puts us in meaningful games the last two weeks of the season

Guys are posting gf totals that add to 275 or better. Regardless of who scores them, I think we're going to score a lot more. 40 more goals puts us at 267. Even improving the ga by 10, if we can score 40 more locks us into a playoff spot. +11 on the goal differential is a near guaranteed playoff spot.

Can we score more? Norris and Batherson combined should score more than last year based on more games played.

Giroux and DeBrincat should score more than Formenton and whoever else flanked Stuetzle.

Formenton Pinto Joseph should score more than whatever makeup we had on the 3rd line last year which at the worst of the COVID outbreak consisted of career Ahlers.

The path to score more is clearly there. I think 50 more is attainable and if we hit that, we go to the playoffs
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,784
30,988
...
Guys are posting gf totals that add to 275 or better. Regardless of who scores them, I think we're going to score a lot more. 40 more goals puts us at 267. Even improving the ga by 10, if we can score 40 more locks us into a playoff spot. +11 on the goal differential is a near guaranteed playoff spot.

...
So, last year:

Fla +94
Tor +62
TBL +54
BOS +35

CAR +76
NYR +47
PENS +43
WAS +30

I'm not sure the top teams will be as dominant this year, but +11 just didn't cut it in the east last year. Heck, even in the west, the VGK missed at +18 as did VAN at +13.
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,126
9,694
So, last year:

Fla +94
Tor +62
TBL +54
BOS +35

CAR +76
NYR +47
PENS +43
WAS +30

I'm not sure the top teams will be as dominant this year, but +11 just didn't cut it in the east last year. Heck, even in the west, the VGK missed at +18 as did VAN at +13.
So is last year a new normal or was it an outlier? Excluding last year, I bet you could go back to the 2000s lockout and you won't find 4 teams that failed to make the playoffs at +11.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,784
30,988
So is last year a new normal or was it an outlier? Excluding last year, I bet you could go back to the 2000s lockout and you won't find 4 teams that failed to make the playoffs at +11.
I think this is partially a function of the top teams just being much better than the bottom teams last year, which will take some time to reverse, as well as goal scoring being way up exaggerating those gaps.

When you look long term, I agree, +11 should be a near guarantee, but teams don't reset randomly every year, good teams last year are generally good teams the next year, so last years results are typcially more informative than those from a decade ago. Will this year see more parity, something similar to last year, or something in the middle. I suspect something in the middle, but you might be right, we'll have to wait and see. there are definitely some signs of increase parity,
 

UglyPuckling

Registered User
May 14, 2021
1,330
687
That's the hope,

I think the teams biggest question mark is goaltending not the D, I'm pretty high on Sanderson and think Hamonic gets a bad rap around here. Brannstrom to me looks like he can handle a top 4 puck mover role with a reliable partner. Our first two callups imo are two 1st Rd picks on the verge of being NHL players. My only concern on D is that well play Zaitsev even if/when he struggles.

We have two goalies than can play like a starter, but aren't sure things, I think we'll be fine but it's an area to keep an eye on.
Most people have Sogaard in their 2023-24 lineup as well (in order to meet cap), so the goaltender concern carries on into the 2023-24 season I would think as well. I'm probably more concerned about 2023-24 goaltending situation than this year. Sogaard doesn't have a lot of NHL experience at this point.
 
Last edited:

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
15,691
9,900
I think the scoring expectations are too high or the playoff expectations are too low.
I’m hoping to be around 265 goals for and 255 goals against which puts us in the playoff conversation. I expect a relatively slow start (.500) but we really ramp it up by the end of November.
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
4,901
4,006
So, last year:

Fla +94
That is actually insane - I hadn't paid attention to that stat but +94 is more than impressive!

I’m hoping to be around 265 goals for and 255 goals against which puts us in the playoff conversation. I expect a relatively slow start (.500) but we really ramp it up by the end of November.
I am firmly of the belief that this team is going to be so jacked up and focused on winning they are going to come out of the gate on fire and put the league on notice right away.

With the way overall scoring has gone and then adding in beginning of season defensive breakdowns we should score enough to win early. I also think our D is naturally far better than it was to start last season so net/net I see a big improvement.

They will then have a natural lull and have to fight their way out of it. Losing games they should win then finally righting the ship and being right in the mix come playoff time.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad