Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 22,882
- 11,184
Except he has the most pp points on the team. Good strategy though...getting rid of the biggest contributor to make it betterI think the pp would be better without Mitch... he gives the pick away all the time.
Except he has the most pp points on the team. Good strategy though...getting rid of the biggest contributor to make it better
Get Rid of the Bumper Position, its stupid
PP1:
Tavares
Nylander | Matthews
Marner | Rielly
PP2:
Micheyev
Kapanen | Johnsson
Barrie | Kerfoot
Get Rid of the Bumper Position, its stupid
PP1:
Tavares
Nylander | Matthews
Marner | Rielly
PP2:
Micheyev
Kapanen | Johnsson
Barrie | Kerfoot
It kind of sounds like they are maybe being over coached maybe?It took them 5 failed powerplays to get to the point of saying "what's the worst that can happen?". Give us another 2-3 1st round losses and we'll change up the lines in the playoffs maybe.
not one of them with a one timer that needs to be respected.5 soft players on the PP and not enough snipers.
It’s worth at least a try. I mean the PP is terrible why not try Barrie.We a need a threat from the point and Barrie should be playing on the Ist PP
It’s worth at least a try. I mean the PP is terrible why not try Barrie.
He has been brutal. To say the least. I agree with ya there. But figured hey maybe a look on the PP might work. Could be a dream that turns into a nightmare though. Lol.He’s played the point. He sucks. He’s drop pass heavy, out of position often and fails to keep the puck in the zone, is butter soft in a one on one contest to the point of being a liability, doesn’t use his shot, has had poor vision distributing the puck and is otherwise not effective.