matching the 4th line against the opposing teams 1st line at the end of a game holding a lead is not a roster problem. routinely giving the 4th line a shift with under 3 minutes in game while trailing is not a roster problem. having your team quit attacking after going ahead by 1 in the 3rd is not a roster problem. continuing to dress the worst forward in the nhl statistically over other options is not a roster problem. putting your leading even strength scorer on the 4th line is not a roster problem. the team regressed to the bottom of the league in even strength scoring despite having the same roster as last year. could keep going on but many of these "roster problems" were a result of the coaches **** poor decisions.I think a lot of the "coaching struggles" were simply roster problems.
Schenn at C, Hakstol tried Weal and Cousins, but both are relatively "slow" and undersized (that is, they lack the speed to attack the middle and the size to either bull their way through or matchup against big centers), Laughton was exiled to LHV for good reason - what options did they have until Flip was acquired (and that explains why Hextall was happy to overpay for a year and a third).
Lines - until they got Flip, Hakstol struggled to find combos that made sense, made worse by Raffl's injury and Weise's off season. G and V simply didn't work together or apart. With Flip, Couts and Schenn could be paired, Simmons with Flip, and G&V back together. Still need the right LW for G&V (Raffl? Lindblom), Weal with F&S may be temporary, Weise looks like a good fit for Couts for now. But it showed that it's not just having 9 solid forwards, but the right 9 that fit together.
Defensemen - Provorov, Ghost (the last month), and Gudas. MDZ is Dr Playgood and Mr. Hide 'Em. Manning, MacDonald, Schultz (and Streit), does it matter? What coach could make this group work?
The Goalies - can't blame this on the coach, same goalies, same system, horrible results.
matching the 4th line against the opposing teams 1st line at the end of a game holding a lead is not a roster problem. routinely giving the 4th line a shift with under 3 minutes in game while trailing is not a roster problem. having your team quit attacking after going ahead by 1 in the 3rd is not a roster problem. continuing to dress the worst forward in the nhl statistically over other options is not a roster problem. putting your leading even strength scorer on the 4th line is not a roster problem. the team regressed to the bottom of the league in even strength scoring despite having the same roster as last year. could keep going on but many of these "roster problems" were a result of the coaches **** poor decisions.
matching the 4th line against the opposing teams 1st line at the end of a game holding a lead is not a roster problem. routinely giving the 4th line a shift with under 3 minutes in game while trailing is not a roster problem. having your team quit attacking after going ahead by 1 in the 3rd is not a roster problem. continuing to dress the worst forward in the nhl statistically over other options is not a roster problem. putting your leading even strength scorer on the 4th line is not a roster problem. the team regressed to the bottom of the league in even strength scoring despite having the same roster as last year. could keep going on but many of these "roster problems" were a result of the coaches **** poor decisions.
matching the 4th line against the opposing teams 1st line at the end of a game holding a lead is not a roster problem. routinely giving the 4th line a shift with under 3 minutes in game while trailing is not a roster problem. having your team quit attacking after going ahead by 1 in the 3rd is not a roster problem. continuing to dress the worst forward in the nhl statistically over other options is not a roster problem. putting your leading even strength scorer on the 4th line is not a roster problem. the team regressed to the bottom of the league in even strength scoring despite having the same roster as last year. could keep going on but many of these "roster problems" were a result of the coaches **** poor decisions.
I think a lot of the "coaching struggles" were simply roster problems.
Schenn at C, Hakstol tried Weal and Cousins, but both are relatively "slow" and undersized (that is, they lack the speed to attack the middle and the size to either bull their way through or matchup against big centers), Laughton was exiled to LHV for good reason - what options did they have until Flip was acquired (and that explains why Hextall was happy to overpay for a year and a third).
Lines - until they got Flip, Hakstol struggled to find combos that made sense, made worse by Raffl's injury and Weise's off season. G and V simply didn't work together or apart. With Flip, Couts and Schenn could be paired, Simmons with Flip, and G&V back together. Still need the right LW for G&V (Raffl? Lindblom), Weal with F&S may be temporary, Weise looks like a good fit for Couts for now. But it showed that it's not just having 9 solid forwards, but the right 9 that fit together.
Defensemen - Provorov, Ghost (the last month), and Gudas. MDZ is Dr Playgood and Mr. Hide 'Em. Manning, MacDonald, Schultz (and Streit), does it matter? What coach could make this group work?
The Goalies - can't blame this on the coach, same goalies, same system, horrible results.
I think a lot of the "coaching struggles" were simply roster problems.
Schenn at C, Hakstol tried Weal and Cousins, but both are relatively "slow" and undersized (that is, they lack the speed to attack the middle and the size to either bull their way through or matchup against big centers), Laughton was exiled to LHV for good reason - what options did they have until Flip was acquired (and that explains why Hextall was happy to overpay for a year and a third).
Lines - until they got Flip, Hakstol struggled to find combos that made sense, made worse by Raffl's injury and Weise's off season. G and V simply didn't work together or apart. With Flip, Couts and Schenn could be paired, Simmons with Flip, and G&V back together. Still need the right LW for G&V (Raffl? Lindblom), Weal with F&S may be temporary, Weise looks like a good fit for Couts for now. But it showed that it's not just having 9 solid forwards, but the right 9 that fit together.
Defensemen - Provorov, Ghost (the last month), and Gudas. MDZ is Dr Playgood and Mr. Hide 'Em. Manning, MacDonald, Schultz (and Streit), does it matter? What coach could make this group work?
The Goalies - can't blame this on the coach, same goalies, same system, horrible results.
Lol, you never stop. How can we turn you off for a few hours?
Positive:
who could not be recognized as ignore list-worthy before sure is recognized after this season
Do dissenting opinions really harm your browsing/posting experience that much?
What does it say about how you feel about your own opinion if merely seeing somebody else express a different one is too much to handle?
Anyway, the biggest positive of this season, to me, is that neither Hextall nor Hakstol has shown any signs of changing their course. The team, as a whole, has performed exactly as they were expected to by most reasonable fans (which is as a "bubble" team). IMO, a different coach makes very little difference when the roster itself is not good enough, and only patience can properly fix that, which Hextall seems to understand.
Do dissenting opinions really harm your browsing/posting experience that much?
What does it say about how you feel about your own opinion if merely seeing somebody else express a different one is too much to handle?
Anyway, the biggest positive of this season, to me, is that neither Hextall nor Hakstol has shown any signs of changing their course. The team, as a whole, has performed exactly as they were expected to by most reasonable fans (which is as a "bubble" team). IMO, a different coach makes very little difference when the roster itself is not good enough, and only patience can properly fix that, which Hextall seems to understand.
Ignore List exists for a good reason and he is not the only member of HF Boards to utilize it.
Voracek lived up to expectations?