MuckOG
Registered User
- May 18, 2012
- 15,569
- 5,610
Except size and playoff experience. In fact, Clowe has some pretty good numbers in the post season.
Possible Trade Ideas v.7
- Thread starter this providence
- Start date
- Status
Except size and playoff experience. In fact, Clowe has some pretty good numbers in the post season.
Blizzard6411
#benchstoner
That right there. If Clutterbuck is being traded, Clowe is not the player to trade him for.
this providence
Chips in Bed Theorem
Size is well and good but we're not exactly talking about somebody that plays small in comparison, so it's mostly moot. Playoff experience is what it is, not sure the goal should be to acquire more San Jose playoff experience, though.
forthewild
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2009
- 4,115
- 0
So Clowe wants a deal before being traded, if he wants anything over 4, and mind you 4 is the absolute ****ing top I would feel comfortable giving him, I hope we stay out of it. sure he can be a great piece to our team but we really can't afford to give out an extra million here or there we need the space to sing Jonas Lidstrom-Brodin in two years.
We dont need fricken Clowe unless you can put him on the third line. Other than that I'd be pissed if the wild traded anyone on the top 6 for him. I say do something with clutter to get a Defenseman
MuckOG
Registered User
- May 18, 2012
- 15,569
- 5,610
I agree with those that say the #1 priority should be to upgrade that 2nd pairing D....I would rather see Fletcher target McBain than Coyle..
Oh well, it might get interesting around here very shortly.
I think Clowe would absolutely be an upgrade over the three players you list.
I do agree with your 2nd point, however.
Oh well, it might get interesting around here very shortly.
I think Clowe would absolutely be an upgrade over the three players you list.
I do agree with your 2nd point, however.
nickschultzfan
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2009
- 11,558
- 908
Mitchell absolutely has a better understanding of the offensive zone than Clutterbuck.
Clutterbuck may get points for himself, but he's not helping his linemates. He never passes and has terrible vision. He gets goals by taking ever shot he gets and crashing the net. Yes, that will get you some goals and make people like you, but it will also negate what your linemates are trying to set-up if they happen to be more skilled than a bang-and-crash line.
Clutterbuck may get points for himself, but he's not helping his linemates. He never passes and has terrible vision. He gets goals by taking ever shot he gets and crashing the net. Yes, that will get you some goals and make people like you, but it will also negate what your linemates are trying to set-up if they happen to be more skilled than a bang-and-crash line.
nickschultzfan
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2009
- 11,558
- 908
Clowe isn't worth $5 million/year, especially when we have kids coming up.
Yes, I would like a talented, big-bodied winger besides Coyle, but Setoguchi and Parise play big for their size, and maybe Larsson can too.
Yes, I would like a talented, big-bodied winger besides Coyle, but Setoguchi and Parise play big for their size, and maybe Larsson can too.
this providence
Chips in Bed Theorem
In comparison to the offensive powerhouse 4th line and all the offense Mitchell and Co. create...
There's a lot of line-up oddities with this staff I can listen to. Mitchell playing over Clutterbuck is one of the most humorous.
There's a lot of line-up oddities with this staff I can listen to. Mitchell playing over Clutterbuck is one of the most humorous.
Sheng Peng
Registered User
Yup. Mitchell might edge Clutterbuck out in a skills competition, but Cal is a far more effective hockey player.
DeuceMN
Really?
I'm not against Clowe, if the price is right, such as one of Fletcher's famed "hockey trades."
He better not be replacing Clutter though. At best that's a washout trade. If we could somhow mve Heater off that third line, Clowe would look nice with Brodziak and Clutterbuck. Imo, that would complete the identity of that third line as well, something it has been lacking so far. That would also be one hell of a third line!
Clowe better not be looking at 5mil/year. Geesus....not for an aging vet, who in his prime was really never worth that, and he ain't gettin' any younger or faster.
3.5mil/year for 3 years would be alright though.
He better not be replacing Clutter though. At best that's a washout trade. If we could somhow mve Heater off that third line, Clowe would look nice with Brodziak and Clutterbuck. Imo, that would complete the identity of that third line as well, something it has been lacking so far. That would also be one hell of a third line!
Clowe better not be looking at 5mil/year. Geesus....not for an aging vet, who in his prime was really never worth that, and he ain't gettin' any younger or faster.
3.5mil/year for 3 years would be alright though.
Dampland
Registered User
The Wild are looking for an upgrade to Stoner/Falk ...which means a Defensive D-man .... McBain is NOT that.
MK9
Registered User
tomgilbertfan
#WhyBother
Minnewildsota
He who laughs last thinks slowest
- Jun 7, 2010
- 8,728
- 3,013
With you 100% dude.
Honestly, I wonder how many good chances Heater could have if Clutterbuck realized he can actually pass it. He had a chance at setting Heatley up against LA with his rocket of a shot and he opted to limpdick shoot it right into Quick's chest.
tomgilbertfan
#WhyBother
PariseSuterKoivu
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2012
- 300
- 22
MK9
Registered User
I am not at all interested in Clowe if Clutterbuck is going the other way.
I honestly don't see them trading Clutter though. Watch it be Bouchard lol
DeuceMN
Really?
- Status
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: New Quarter Backs for the Handball team!- Latest: DanielPlainview
-
