Yep Staal was surprised he was moved. IIRC he went to a brothers wedding over a weekend and found out he was gone when came back.
IMO Shero had the right idea until Hossa didn't re-sign, and he just didn't recover from that.
It was his own wedding.
If that's the case, I can't imagine why he'd be surprised. He just turned down a 60M dollar contract to "look around." Of course his ass is getting traded. And to UM: I get what you mean but you'd really have been alright w/ Staal at 6M per for a decade? No. On top of it working out likely as Coach described (Staalkin fiasco), it would have been far too much to pay for a luxury. Staal helped the Penguins win by being a very good third liner. That is by no means some sort of unicorn that needs paid out the nose for over a vast period of time. You draft another one. Don't let a vast run of incompetence fool you into believing that isn't possible and somewhat common.
You see, that offer doesn't go away just because he wants to feel out his worth. He ended up taking the exact same deal tells me he would be a Pens still. Yes. Staal would have been worth it being the cornerstone of that 3rd line. And Yes...Teams extend $$$ to guys that make a difference for them. Staal was 24 when traded.
Keeping Staal would have effected other moves and most likely trimmed the fat much sooner elsewhere. Who...? Take your pick of Dupuis, Kunitz, Orpik and who knows what other secondary players.
Would you rather have Staal or soon to be older vets at near top coin? That is what was in play at the time.
They could have been, Crosby, Malkin, Letang, Staal, Fleury and Neal. The wrong in thinking Staal being gone is good is thinking changes couldn't happen if he stayed. Things got worse due to him being gone. The wrong guys got new deals. The drafting stayed the same and passed over better selections with him gone. There were better selection could have been taken after the trade but they didn't materialize.
Point being, the Pens didn't get better. Wasted asset. Because the best your getting back now is either Dumoulin or Pouliot 3 years after the fact and neither will be an impact as Staal even if you combine them.
What would be sad had they kept Staal is they still would have passed over the standout forwards and Maatta to take Pouliot.
I don't hate, Pouliot, but I hate they passed over top ten picks to pick a later teen pick who hasn't been able to make his picking that high worth the gamble. At a position of no need at that point in time.
Just think, they'd be forced into the youth movement. Bennett was probably still M.A.S.H but he'd be in better shape to play higher in the roster.
Just one simple signing could have changed this teams makeup sooner. The right way.
Edit: Also, to hold onto the picked player to justify the trade is just plain dumb. (Kesler)