I think you are remembering wrong. My only Mez vs. Gus argument was that the job was Mez's to lose because he has shown over a longer time period that he is the better player. I repeatedly said that if Gus won the job in camp I have no problem giving him the spot. The counter to that argument was that Gus had already won the job based on his 60 NHL games and Mez had lost the job based on his injury plagued previous season. That was something with which I did not (and still do not) agree. Mez was written off before the season started because Gus had earned the spot and even if he didn't he should be given first crack because he was better (based on 60 games over three NHL seasons and 11 games coming off an injury). Too small a sample size to write a guy off, and too small a sample size to say a guy is established.
I honestly don't remember saying that, but even if I did, it was likely after Gus had played in 30 NHL games over two seasons. I'd probably still stand by that. It was like my feelings on Akeson vs. Downie going in to the playoffs. If it were me, I would have started Downie. Why? because I haven't seen enough of Akeson at the NHL to say what he is. Outside of his blunder game one Akeson has played well. But that doesn't mean I'm an ******* for wanting to go with an established player (albeit a slumping one) over a wild card. Would the Flyers have won game one if Downie played? Who knows? But I'm always going to give deference to the guy that has been there before. Sometimes you'll be right, sometimes you'll be wrong, but the safest bet is to go with what you know.
That is far from what I recall. My recollection was that Gus HAD earned the spot going into the season.
I'm no advanced stats experts, but Mez's CORSI rating appears to be better than Gus's, as does his QoC ratings. It looks like he had slightly more offensive zone starts than Gus, so I am not sure if you are accurate with what you are saying about the harder competition or playing better. You might be, I honestly don't know how to read these stats. Maybe you could site to something to clarify?