Dipsy Doodle
Rent A Barn
- May 28, 2006
- 76,590
- 21,129
Doubt is warranted. That goes for the entire team but definitely maf. But we should, like you did, acknowledge the good.
For sure. It was nice to see him get that 8th shutout.
Doubt is warranted. That goes for the entire team but definitely maf. But we should, like you did, acknowledge the good.
Pretty easy to make the case that he's the single most culpable player on the team for the Pens' playoff struggles from 2010 to 2014, which is why some people were pissed when he re-signed.
But he had a pretty good playoffs last year, and is playing very well this year when the opponents aren't from the Metro. I really do hope he thrives in the playoffs this year.
Well 2012 was a complete abandonment of any defensive structure whatsoever in the Flyers series. Fleury was abysmal, but the team in front surely wasn't helping him.
2010 was the inability to score on Halak who threw it into deity mode for that series.
2011 was the Lightning series. We were without Sid and Malkin, so he needed to step up to secure that series and didn't.
2013 against the Islanders he certainly was playing piss poor. Vokoun helped settle our team down and help us to play better defensively as well.
2014 he really only played badly in game 3 (was it?) against Columbus.
In summary:
2010 playoffs: Not the problem
2011 playoffs: Part of the problem
2012 playoffs: Part of the problem
2013 playoffs: Big problem, but bigger problems showed up against Boston
2014 playoffs: Not the problem
His playoff performance leaves much to be desired, and is still a question mark. I just don't understand the mentality of "get rid of Fleury and we'll win a cup" which the anti-Fleury crowd seem to frequently allude to.
I've been a member of the Fleury Hate Brigade before, especially in 2013. But we have more pressing issues at hand.
Fair assessment except in 2010. If you go back to the Montreal series and look at the goals he let in, he was every bit as bad as he was in 2012 and 2013. We can excuse 2011. But basically every playoff series that we've been healthy since the Cup, Fleury has poo'd the bed. Last year was a step in the right direction, minus one or two. But in 2010, he was just as much the problem as our offense not being able to score on Halak (who to his credit, was a god).
+++ Kunitz-Crosby-Perron played very well, a tremendous game for this trio.
+ Fleury
- Arcobello was trash. Drop him back on waivers, do not want.
- Malkin's decision-making on the PP. Needs to be better, but he has missed a couple weeks.
My main problem with the Fleury-hate crowd is that they seem to blame him for our playoff collapses.
Was he part of the problem? Certainly. Was he the entire problem? Not even close.
Pathetic team defense, lack of depth scoring or just scoring in general, getting physically dominated, failure of the coach to systematically adjust, piss poor neutral zone play and costly turnovers. It's way too easy to point fingers at the guy who ultimately lets the puck in the net, when all of the guys in front of him are playing like garbage.
Arcobello is a nice insurance option as a 13 th forward. Can play anywhere in a pinch if someone gets banged up. Sure beats Ebbett. Hopefully Bennett gets a shot in that spot tonight
Agree with you there.
As for Portabello, I envision him being useless in the top 6 and extra useless come playoff time on any line. But maybe it's just me.
Arcobello is a nice insurance option as a 13 th forward. Can play anywhere in a pinch if someone gets banged up. Sure beats Ebbett. Hopefully Bennett gets a shot in that spot tonight
In the playoffs, Arco >>> Sill/Adams