You mean Chelsea , right?
No. I mean Napoli. It's not like Napoli was a scrub club when Sarri got there, they already establishing themselves a top team in Italy.
In Mazzari's last 2 seasons they finished 2nd and 3rd and won the Cup as well.
Benitez didn't work out, but this wasn't a squad of peasants that Sarri magically turned into a decent team by himself.
Distant?.... 4 points is distant? You do realize how much of an achievement that is right? Take a look at the financial disparity. It's a ridiculous gap. I mean, Juve's 15 points ahead right now post-Sarri.
I don't think Juve were threatened at all. And in that case, yes, it's a distant 2nd (or 3rd, like in 16-17).
For a long time last season Napoli held pace, even led, but when push same to shove, first Juve won in Naples and then Napoli just started throwing points away. Napoli did win in Turin, but it was too little too late.
I'm not saying Sarri was expected to win vs Juve, but him finishing 2nd/3rd/2nd isn't really exceeding expectations either.
In the end, Mazzari did the same AND won the Coppa.
And yeah, they purposely threw European comps his last season there in order to focus on the league. Disagree with it if you like , but that's what he did.
They threw the Champions League by bowing out in the group stages, on purpose?
Well, there you go, just goes to show how next level Napoli are, they're the one club in the world apparently willing to throw in the CL.
Wrong. It's far more direct than aimless tiki-taka , Chelsea just don't operate it consistently.
I guess you can blame the whole team instead of the one manager.
To me, Chelsea is boring. They're predictable, they're slow, safe, bland and unexciting. They lack ideas and are snail-paced in transition.
Chance at a counter? "Wait, wait, Jorginho didn't touch the ball, turn it back, turn it back."
Sarri either wants to play better football in the same style but doesn't have the players for it - or simply wants this type of football.
But one thing he does not do is adapt.
Conte's Chelsea was a defensive team that was genuinely exciting to watch as they transition so fast going forward, with largely the same players (Costa instead of Morata/Higuain is the one major difference). At least in his first season, before he lost the plot.
Pep had his problems in his first year at City, but they were mostly defensive. Offensively, the team started catching on relatively quickly, it was possession-based and they were creating loads...
Sarri's Chelsea looks more like Lopetegui's Madrid than Pep's City in that regard.
Look, I'm not looking for an argument here, maybe Sarri turns it around and gets Chelsea back to being a top contender.
Good on him if he does.