lilidk
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2008
- 9,902
- 3,616
I believe it is a plan YzerplanYou just want that so you can call them the BRR line lmao
I believe it is a plan YzerplanYou just want that so you can call them the BRR line lmao
This is what being a Minnesota Vikings fan does to your brain. You just anticipate disappointment.
It remains to be seen if Ned can be a 50+ game starting goalie too but if you think I'm jumping off this big, beautiful Hype Train and joining you on the Mopey Express you've got another thing coming, my dude.
Too busy destroying their salary cap structure and trading for players about to retire.Why didn't Chicago qualify?
Brunnstrom
per CapF
CURRENT CAP SPACE : $32,115,277
guessing:
Hronek $4.25--4.75m*5-6y
Bert $4--4.9m*3-6y
Vrana $4.75--$6*3-6y
...so ~ $17M leftover
If you're not hyped after an NHL debut hat trick, are you even alive?
I was hyped about Brome, as was much of the board. Just because he didn't perform doesn't mean that Suter won't perform.
You need to break down that wall around your heart and learn to let love in.
concerning hronek ive seen enough to be hoping for 5 years easily . say 5X5 would be great to me
Does Suter speak German?
Does Suter speak German?
those players have nothing to do with hronek , theyre all in differing situations and ages . how good you think werenski would have looked with dekeyser on detroit instead of whatchamacallit on cbj ????????? let me tell you = you wouldnt be as impressed by him . hronek has proved he is a solid all around dman thats rugged enough in own end to not shy away from the conflict while doing a solid job defending . hes also shown he can get the puck up ice and help the rush in that manner . and all along hes played on a JUNK TEAM vs opponants top pairings . and hes 25 still with upside . im looking to lock him in long term for both his talent and competitiveness with the outlook that in a few years with a better partner and team hes going to be seen as a very valuable but underpayed player . but for hroneks sake hes set for life and might not become as good as i think so theres upside for him too
NHL Rankings
5 million for Hronek would make him tied with Danny DeKeyser, Ryan Pullock, Morgan Rielly, Dmitri Orlov, Sam Girard, Zach Werenski, and Alex Goligoski for being the 51st highest paid defenseman in the NHL.
Filip Hronek is better than only 1 of them. (DeKeyser)
NHL Rankings
5 million for Hronek would make him tied with Danny DeKeyser, Ryan Pullock, Morgan Rielly, Dmitri Orlov, Sam Girard, Zach Werenski, and Alex Goligoski for being the 51st highest paid defenseman in the NHL.
Filip Hronek is better than only 1 of them. (DeKeyser)
Exactly, no need to roast you then.
I'm happy to report that Hronek is 23yo. Turns 24 in Nov.those players have nothing to do with hronek , theyre all in differing situations and ages . how good you think werenski would have looked with dekeyser on detroit instead of whatchamacallit on cbj ????????? let me tell you = you wouldnt be as impressed by him . hronek has proved he is a solid all around dman thats rugged enough in own end to not shy away from the conflict while doing a solid job defending . hes also shown he can get the puck up ice and help the rush in that manner . and all along hes played on a JUNK TEAM vs opponants top pairings . and hes 25 still with upside . im looking to lock him in long term for both his talent and competitiveness with the outlook that in a few years with a better partner and team hes going to be seen as a very valuable but underpayed player . but for hroneks sake hes set for life and might not become as good as i think so theres upside for him too
Got the lottery numbers also Mr Fortune teller?I told you guys.
tanx i mis typed , and the 23 displays more so how right i am about the 5x5I'm happy to report that Hronek is 23yo. Turns 24 in Nov.
Sergachev's contract was all RFA years, he's still RFA when it expires.I sincerely doubt Hronek gets Sergachev money. I'd offer him 3.5aav for 2 years. He has points but doesn't have the defensive metrics to back up asking for more than that.
those players have nothing to do with hronek , theyre all in differing situations and ages . how good you think werenski would have looked with dekeyser on detroit instead of whatchamacallit on cbj ????????? let me tell you = you wouldnt be as impressed by him . hronek has proved he is a solid all around dman thats rugged enough in own end to not shy away from the conflict while doing a solid job defending . hes also shown he can get the puck up ice and help the rush in that manner . and all along hes played on a JUNK TEAM vs opponants top pairings . and hes 25 still with upside . im looking to lock him in long term for both his talent and competitiveness with the outlook that in a few years with a better partner and team hes going to be seen as a very valuable but underpayed player . but for hroneks sake hes set for life and might not become as good as i think so theres upside for him too