Don'tcry4mejanhrdina
Registered User
Geno beat up Craig Adams. If that isn't leadership, I don't know what is.
Man this part is where I feel there is an interesting discussion. JR sat there and said Geno/Sid wanted protection. I call 100000000000000000000% bull**** on that. But they said it over and over and over again.
Then we lose in the playoffs and what is the FIRST thing out of 71's mouth? "We need to be faster". What in the ****?
So what is real? Because I was getting sick and damn tired of hearing how "comfortable" Sid/Geno felt out there with Reaves in the lineup. Complete bull****.
I call that heroism.Geno beat up Craig Adams. If that isn't leadership, I don't know what is.
I still don't think Reaves was a terrible move on paper. He's not a bad 4th liner. Probably overpaid, but still. That's one where the GM really needed to sit down and talk to the coach first. It's like those two decided to never speak to one another for 14 months or something.Judging by the way Malkin has always behaved after a dirty hit or when the team needs a lift. He seems fine fighting his battles.
Judging by how smart Sid is when it comes to hockey. I can understand him appreciating the role, but let’s be honest. Reaves probably would’ve been fine here if we got a legit 4C. And let’s be more honest Sid and Geno play in a way that better suits the Downie’s, Cooke’s and Kunitz’s of the world. Not Reaves.
I still don't think Reaves was a terrible move on paper. He's not a bad 4th liner. Probably overpaid, but still. That's one where the GM really needed to sit down and talk to the coach first. It's like those two decided to never speak to one another for 14 months or something.
i could sorta stomach Sundqvist for Reaves, but us adding was pretty wtfTrading your only ready for the NHL center prospect for a 4th liner is pretty bad.
i could sorta stomach Sundqvist for Reaves, but us adding was pretty wtf
Reaves plus their 2nd
The part everyone forgets.
What a turd that that ended up being.I didn't forget. Our 1st for their 2nd is still adding
it hurts because Sundvist was a contributor to a Cup winner, but I also agree with the sentiment that Reaves could/should have been useful here. Reaves has shown he can play with good skaters. Acquiring Reaves only backfired because it seemed to coincide with the team around him getting inexplicably (based on the b2b cups) slowerWhat a turd that that ended up being.
it hurts because Sundvist was a contributor to a Cup winner, but I also agree with the sentiment that Reaves could/should have been useful here. Reaves has shown he can play with good skaters. Acquiring Reaves only backfired because it seemed to coincide with the team around him getting inexplicably (based on the b2b cups) slower
it hurts because Sundvist was a contributor to a Cup winner, but I also agree with the sentiment that Reaves could/should have been useful here. Reaves has shown he can play with good skaters. Acquiring Reaves only backfired because it seemed to coincide with the team around him getting inexplicably (based on the b2b cups) slower
If Sundqvist showed half of what he did with the Blues with the Penguins, I doubt they would have sent him out, especially given the fact they had no 3C or 4C at the time.
It sucks when players you send out break out but it happens. Doesn't change the logic of the trade at the time of it happening. Shame too because I really liked what Sundqvist was able to do with the Blues. I often wonder if they didn't send him out, what the roster make up for us would be. Would Simon be here? Bleuger? Who knows.
What a turd that that ended up being.
If Sundqvist showed half of what he did with the Blues with the Penguins, I doubt they would have sent him out, especially given the fact they had no 3C or 4C at the time.
Subdqvist was making good progress exactly like you wanted for a prospect. That year in the NHL he had 20 goals and 23 assist while being a great defensive center. He was perfectly where he needed to be for a prospect.
I would argue he showed half and the upside was there. They just wanted reeves more and ignored the need for a center.
Don’t really see what Sundqvist has to do with those two?
We needed a 3C and 4C heading out of 2016-17. JR knew he was low balling Bones and wasn’t signing Kunitz, and I’m pretty sure he knew Cullen was likely gone too.
We could’ve acquired Sheahan and ran Sheahan and Sundqvist up the gut and used valuable assets / cap space to solve the obvious D problems that were coming. Instead JR addressed an issue that wasn’t an issue and didn’t focus on the problems.
I love Rust, but when you have Sprong ready to break into the league. Why do you sign him to a 4 year deal and sign a UFA D for the bottom pairing vet role. Move Rust for an improvement for D. And let Sprong play as the bottom top nine RW behind Kessel and Horny.