The Portland Pirates hockey team was losing about $500,000 a year and sought major concessions from the operators of the county-owned Cross Insurance Arena to cover more than half that amount before the team was sold and relocated in May.
Both sides had agreed to extend the original five-year lease, which ran through April 2019, by two years if the financial alterations could be worked out. Although the two sides were just $45,000 apart over financial arrangements, they couldn’t reach an agreement before Cain announced the team had been sold.
I feel like naming a team the Indians wouldn't fly today.
Honestly, I wonder if this will open the door to the QMJHL. I know they've tried Maine before, but they have some really struggling franchises and nowhere left to go in Canada. Being the only part of the CHL without any American franchises, this might be an enticing spot to expand their footprint.
I actually feel really, really bad for Hutch today.
Even if he went to like two games in 23 years.
Had a feeling Portland was going to lose their AHL team. Sad to see it happen but hopefully this opens the door for an ECHL team that could probably do well there.
Portland didn't lose the Pirates? You mean they are still there? Or are you splitting hairs to say they weren't "lost" they were "taken"?a) we didn't lose them; It's not the first time Springfield got shafted by the Jets/Coyotes, and Roy Boe's movement to Bridgeport due to conflict of multiple team ownership forced the Ice Cats eventual relocation much as San Jose did w/ the Barracuda.
I don't understand what this has to do with the current situation? Worcester doesn't have an AHL team anymore. They are bringing in an ECHL team next season. Why would they be the impetus for keeping an AHL team in Springfield? Seems to me like it would benefit the current Worcester owner to have Springfield go ECHL also.b) Worcester, as I recall, was the impetus for keeping Springfield in the league. how were the Falcons created to keep continuity there, this is the same principle...
Portland didn't lose the Pirates? You mean they are still there? Or are you splitting hairs to say they weren't "lost" they were "taken"?
I don't understand what this has to do with the current situation? Worcester doesn't have an AHL team anymore. They are bringing in an ECHL team next season. Why would they be the impetus for keeping an AHL team in Springfield? Seems to me like it would benefit the current Worcester owner to have Springfield go ECHL also.
It's not the first time Springfield got shafted
So this part is just ancient history and has nothing to do with the current situation, right?1994,royals, Worcester went from Springfield by definition of history, and were owned privately, before the St. Louis to Peoria fiasco (now Utica)
Springfield's done this before, as part of allowing the former club to leave, they struck a side deal to keep hockey there, hence the Falcons branding since, legally binding.
By "exist" do you mean someone in Portland still owns the rights to use the Pirates name and logo? Because that isn't a team. If there isn't a franchise, there isn't really a team. The team formerly known as the Portland Pirates moved to Springfield and was renamed the Thunderbirds, unless I misunderstood?the Pirates exist, there is no active franchise, but they will if/when an ECHL club arrives.
So this part is just ancient history and has nothing to do with the current situation, right?
By "exist" do you mean someone in Portland still owns the rights to use the Pirates name and logo? Because that isn't a team. If there isn't a franchise, there isn't really a team. The team formerly known as the Portland Pirates moved to Springfield and was renamed the Thunderbirds, unless I misunderstood?
I hope a team does end up there, don't get me wrong, I'm a big Brad Church fan from his days in Reading, and my sister lives in NH, so I'd love an excuse to make a road trip to visit her and see the Royals play in Maine. But, currently there is no team in Portland.
I think you may be the only person to look at this situation and conclude that SPRINGFIELD got shafted. I can't possibly see how anyone even in Springfield would think they have been shafted.
it's not the first time, BTV, I can remember Winnipeg 1.0(Arizona) pulling out of Springfield but not buying the franchise affiliate outright, and the outrage, by all fanbases as to why such moves are made.
and then there's the faction that Arizona is leaving there entirely based off a deluded sense because no one believes IA actually owns said franchise.
which is worse, having Springfield buy your franchise or Arizona/IA DO IT, which is wht we had to be on guard for when they affiliated w/ the Pirates.
The whole of the AHL is heading down the toidy.
I agree. I feel more and more like the AHL is just an appendage of the NHL, a temporary holding tank to deal with salary cap issues. Winning isn't important, "player development" is now paramount. It makes me feel like the AHL is just an extended scrimmage/practice vehicle to keep high-paid bodies warm.
Too damn right.
I was a season ticket holder in Springfield between 1988 and 2000; a short blip in the history of the AHL, right? But of the 130+ teams in league history (including name and city changes), I saw forty of them play. That's nuts ... and in the sixteen years since I moved from Springfield, there've been over forty more.
17 AHL teams this season haven't broken 5000 average attendance. What the hell is Albany doing averaging less than 3000 fans a night? How are the Marlies, when Leafs tickets are sold out since forever, not getting to 5K a night? Milwaukee's way down. Hershey's way down. Grand Rapids is way down. Hartford's at 3500.
Even less than ever before, AHL fans don't get to know their players. Even less than before, they don't get traditional rivalries.
Milwaukee's way down.