Michoulicious
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2014
- 6,971
- 7,418
The signing bonus issue is a non-issue with our ownership group, as evidenced by their willingness to take on that structure in acquiring ROR's contract.
As far as "front-loading" dollars, there is really only so much any team can do under the current CBA. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think the lowest amount for any one year has to be at least 50% of the highest amount per year in that same deal. So a contract that has a front-loaded annual amount of salary and bonus of $12M can't have a year any lower than $6M. There is only so much front-loading you're going to be able to do without significantly impacting the AAV and cap hit. If it takes $72M over 8 years for STL to keep him and they decide to do it, they will have no issue making a deal structured along the lines of 12-12-10-10-8-8-6-6 work. I'd be really surprised if any team went any higher than $14M in one year without drifting into Karlsson territory, and I suspect the Blues would be out of that market.
Meh, "contender" nothing. FAs choose money first every year. Cup winners don't tend to be full of $10 million UFA signings; part of building a contending roster is managing cap space.
Buffalo has already wasted enough cap space trying to buy their way out of poor scouting/drafting/development. And even if Ristolainen were traded for a forward, they atill have Montour, Jokiharju, and Miller on RD.
That said, if Botterill stays employed he could be stupid/desperate enough.
Fat chance i see Alex Pietrangelo leaving St a Louis for Buffalo. Last thing Buffalo needs is another $10+ million contract.
I thought it was 50% of the previous year, not highest year, but could be wrong on that it's been awhile since I looked it up. So you can go 20-10-5 for 35 million 3 year deal, again maybe I'm mistaken but I'd like to know how it works on back diving deals. I'm sure the next CBA will touch on the LTIR retirement plans for these type contracts. Hossa should have guaranteed that.
Year to year change max is 35%
Ratio of max year to min year is 2:1 or Lowest is 50% of highest
On an all increasing contract you don’t have to follow these rules.
no he isnt. its kinda a running joke that leafs fans think everyone is going there but with the cap space they have now it doesnt really happen anymoreBut he’s going to the Leafs....
With what money? I dont know if u remember but they spent their money on Tavares/Matthews and Marner.But he’s going to the Leafs....
I feel like the Faulk signing almost made that impossibleHe's staying in St Louis.
Assuming Pietrangelo walks from the Blues, he would be an ideal RHD partner for Dahlin. I’m anticipating Risto finally gets traded for forward help. What is the speculated value of his new contract? Something in the $10.5 to 11 million for 6/7 years? Sabres will have approximately $35 million in cap space heading into the summer with a bunch of RFA’s and a couple of UFA’s to sign.
O boy that went right over your head.With what money? I dont know if u remember but they spent their money on Tavares/Matthews and Marner.
over my head? I follow what ur saying. I saw the articles. and it's nothing but click bait. come on broO boy that went right over your head.
It’s sarcasm... or do we need to put emojis to make it more clear?over my head? I follow what ur saying. I saw the articles. and it's nothing but click bait. come on bro
I feel like the Faulk signing almost made that impossible
Umm when ur writing in text it's most likely a good idea..... Am I suppose to just assume what you were thinking?It’s sarcasm... or do we need to put emojis to make it more clear?
After the Faulk signing I dunno if theres enough room. only 7.5M available for St. Louis and Tarasenko is on the LTIR so I assume that cap isn't included on the books currently. where exactly will the cap come from to resign Pietrangelo?Armstrong will keep him
I feel like the Faulk signing almost made that impossible
Generally on these boards the use of multiple periods indicates something. You don’t need to be a mind reader to get that.Umm when ur writing in text it's most likely a good idea..... Am I suppose to just assume what you were thinking?
I didnt find the Faulk trade odd the signing I thought was very odd considering Pietrangelo is their guy. he must have told them he was planning on testing Free Agency. I wouldn`t have spoiled the chance to resign him for Faulk.I wonder if STL went out and got/extended Faulk because they already knew Pietrangelo was planning on testing the UFA market. Because otherwise it seems pretty awful cap management to spend that kind of money on a player who will be your 3rd best RHD. It's weird to think about Pietro leaving St. Louis, but it's also weird that there's been no contract extension so far if he's staying, and I haven't even seen any news about negotiations. And the Faulk trade and sign starts making a lot more sense if that's Pietro's plan.
Maybe the Sabres can be a contender with Pietrangelo.To leave as a free agent, he'd be 10+ IMO, but I also don't see him leaving for a team that isn't at least a contender.