Phoenix XC: Down to the Weiers

Status
Not open for further replies.

CrazyMonkey1208

Registered User
Apr 9, 2012
1,222
851
Darren Dreger‏@DarrenDreger3m
Bettman and Daly will be in Glendale for the councils vote. Expect ample discussion prior to the vote, so it will be late before vote is in.

I don't see s Teterboro-Glendale flight on flightaware, anyone else have one? ;)
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,301
21,029
Between the Pipes
What am I missing here?

The stated fact by some that if the CoG doesn't agree to lose money and keep the team, that the result will be the implosion of the arena, Westgate, the CoG, the state of Arizona, and ultimately the known universe..... but that could just be a worst case scenario. :sarcasm:
 

Major4Boarding

Unfamiliar Moderator
Jan 30, 2009
5,431
2,438
South of Heaven
It would be useless to just remove the "including" parenthesis you quote above: the AMF would still clearly be an "arena-related expenditure", and there would still be ambiguity as to whether debt service is too.

If the city's out clause is still there at all.. the term "operating loss" should be defined to determine the scope of arena-related expenses (and for RSE's out clause, the scope of team expenses).

Duly noted. Perhaps then, less ambiguity in some finely tuned inserted verbiage excluding the debt service? I mean, I understand it now it's basically Out Clause In or Out Clause out... but the debt service is there regardless of the outcome.
 

tony d

New poll series coming from me on June 3
Jun 23, 2007
76,601
4,558
Behind A Tree
Guess we should know something by the end of today. Whatever happens I hope this is the end of discussion as it relates to this franchise and they can enjoy either a new beginning in Phoenix or a rebirth in Seattle or Quebec City or wherever.

Some trivia before I hit submit, the franchise spent 17 years as a NHL teams in Winnipeg and from the looks of things it might be 17 years as a NHL team in Phoenix. Hopefully they'll last more than 17 yrs. wherever they go to next.
 

CasualFan

Tortious Beadicus
Nov 27, 2009
3,215
0
Bay Area, CA
topher42 said:
Darren Dreger‏@DarrenDreger3m
Bettman and Daly will be in Glendale for the councils vote. Expect ample discussion prior to the vote, so it will be late before vote is in.

What's the probability that Gary and Bill would be in attendance without advanced notice from Glendale that terms the NHL approves are in place? About 0% sound right?
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
It seems to me that today is all about whether or not the COG will approve a lease based on the previous version, which does not include an "out clause" for the COG. So, we'll see how firmly various council members stand by the revised version with the out clause.

My guess is that Bowers and the city financial staff have urged the "out clause" as a way of trying to allay concerns of bond rating agencies. They have already been put on notice with respect to their structural deficit and their seeming willingness to exacerbate their financial woes with a large financial commitment to subsidize the Coyotes. By limiting their longer term liability with the "out clause", perhaps they are hoping that they don't get too badly hammered by the bond rating agencies.

The COG probably also needs to consider the "worst case scenario", which in this case isn't that unlikely. That would be that the RSE doesn't realize the revenue projections, ends up losing an average of $10 million per year (or more) over the next five years, and exercises its own "out clause". At that point, the COG has poured another $75 million into the enterprise, and is left without an "anchor tenant", and has to go through the process of finding a new arena manager five years hence. But a number of the council members will probably not think about that in the presence of Bettman (aka "Oz the Great and Powerful").
 

thiscalltoarms

Registered User
Jun 26, 2013
149
0
Boston- Seattle- NJ
What's the probability that Gary and Bill would be in attendance without advanced notice from Glendale that terms the NHL approves are in place? About 0% sound right?

Depends. If I was Gary then I would be there to make a simple announcement like "we're relocating the Coyotes due to the City of Glendale's decision to vote in favor of a proposal today that was rejected on Friday as non-viable for RSE, Fortress, and the NHL. There will be a press conference tomorrow morning at 11am to announce the destination to which the Coyotes will continue to thrive and hopefully win a Stanley Cup."

That's the only reason that I'd be in that meeting at this point if I was Gary. It makes the point that WE ALL KNOW- that the City council approving a non-starter agreement is really only an attempt to win PR points while voting the Yotes out of AZ. I can't imagine Gary doesn't throw it back in their faces tonight.
 

Gotaf7

Registered User
Nov 6, 2011
2,602
2,563
What's the probability that Gary and Bill would be in attendance without advanced notice from Glendale that terms the NHL approves are in place? About 0% sound right?


I agree, Gongdale caved! Now can the Clowns close the transaction?
 

madhi19

Just the tip!
Jun 2, 2012
4,396
252
Cold and Dark place!
twitter.com
Depends. If I was Gary then I would be there to make a simple announcement like "we're relocating the Coyotes due to the City of Glendale's decision to vote in favor of a proposal today that was rejected on Friday as non-viable for RSE, Fortress, and the NHL. There will be a press conference tomorrow morning at 11am to announce the destination to which the Coyotes will continue to thrive and hopefully win a Stanley Cup."

That's the only reason that I'd be in that meeting at this point if I was Gary.
Would he even bother showing up and giving the media some fodder. Instead of making a press release that would get buried in pre-4th of July laziness. Really not a bad week to relocate an NHL team nobody but the respective fan bases will notice.
 

LPHabsFan

Registered User
Jul 14, 2003
2,620
1,249
Montreal
Visit site
What's the probability that Gary and Bill would be in attendance without advanced notice from Glendale that terms the NHL approves are in place? About 0% sound right?

Actually I see it as the opposite. If they knew they were going to approve the changes then they would just sit back, relax, and watch it online like the rest of. But to me, the fact that they are going means they still need to do a lot of convincing and that is easier to do in person rather than over the phone. Plus, what would be the benefit of being there knowing there is a yes vote?
 

JimAnchower

Registered User
Dec 8, 2012
1,460
256
I agree, Gongdale caved! Now can the Clowns close the transaction?

If the COG approves a deal that RSE likes, there could still be things that prevent the deal from being complete.

- RSE has to raise the money. If Gosbee has indeed backed out, then that could severly impact their chances of closing the deal.

- GWI or someone else could sue

- A signature drive is done to put this measure on a ballot
 

PeaSouper

Registered User
Jul 28, 2009
76
0
London, UK
Anyone have a registration number for the NHL plane...maybe there is already a scheduled flight from Glendale to Seattle ? Or back to Teterboro then up north to Quebec :naughty:

The NHL doesn't own a plane, but rather they hire private aircraft as they need them. So, you can't just track an N-number.

This doesn't show any flight plans filed at all departing out of Glendale, as of right now:

http://flightaware.com/live/airport/KGEU
 

madhi19

Just the tip!
Jun 2, 2012
4,396
252
Cold and Dark place!
twitter.com
Maybe 'lil Gary will stage a filibuster, talk for 156 hours straight and delay the vote until the CoG caves? :sarcasm:
You don't rent a plane to go somewhere and rent another plane just to go back or somewhere else. Especially if it a small stop the plane you rented will stay on the tarmac or the nearest hangars. This is the plane Gary will fly back to New York but where that plane goes next that the question. Sadly he will be awfully closer to the West coast by tonight.
We see it on that page when they file the next flight plan.
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,301
21,029
Between the Pipes
What's the probability that Gary and Bill would be in attendance without advanced notice from Glendale that terms the NHL approves are in place? About 0% sound right?

During the final death throes with the Winnipeg Jets 1.0, Gary and friend made physical appearances in Winnipeg. They did not come to welcome in a new deal, or broker a new deal... they came to show the seriousness of the relocation threat. They are putting a face to the message to show the CoG that they are serious this time.

So I would say it's 50-50 right now.
 

gyom999

Registered User
May 7, 2013
56
0
Quebec city
So what are they voting for today!? The more I read the blurier it gets..!




They posted document for the public and then they can change anything they want (I read they had 24h prior to vote to make changes), vote for the old proposal, for their counter-proposal, for modified proposal.. wtf.
 

Mightygoose

Registered User
Nov 5, 2012
5,625
1,451
Ajax, ON
If the COG approves a deal that RSE likes, there could still be things that prevent the deal from being complete.

- RSE has to raise the money. If Gosbee has indeed backed out, then that could severly impact their chances of closing the deal.

- GWI or someone else could sue

- A signature drive is done to put this measure on a ballot

Plus if the close by August 5 is still intact, that's even less time than Jamison had

http://www.glendaleaz.com/documents...ProposalforArenaManagementAgreement062813.pdf

 The city requests that an agreement with Renaissance Sports & Entertainment Group (RSE) be signed by RSE by July 8, 2013 and close by August 5, 2013. The prior agreement did not specify dates.
 

McManked

Ooh to be a Gooner
Jan 16, 2011
19,520
3
Edmonton, AB
So will a decision on the future in Phoenix 100% be made by the end of today, or is there a chance for a delay once again.
 

maruk14

Registered User
Jun 24, 2002
2,928
0
Seattle, WA
Visit site
Actually I see it as the opposite. If they knew they were going to approve the changes then they would just sit back, relax, and watch it online like the rest of. But to me, the fact that they are going means they still need to do a lot of convincing and that is easier to do in person rather than over the phone. Plus, what would be the benefit of being there knowing there is a yes vote?

True - and the tweet said "expect ample discussion before the vote". This is Bettman and Daly putting one last, very serious push in getting a deal done to keep the team in Glendale and they have cover either way:

Phoenix Stays - We flew in and saved the day
Phoenix Relocates - We flew in and did everything we possibly could but Glendale wouldn't cooperate.

So I would say it's 50-50 right now.

This - its a coin toss and anyone can rationalize a point of view based on the little tidbit of news that is put out there.
 

barneyg

Registered User
Apr 22, 2007
2,383
0
Duly noted. Perhaps then, less ambiguity in some finely tuned inserted verbiage excluding the debt service? I mean, I understand it now it's basically Out Clause In or Out Clause out... but the debt service is there regardless of the outcome.

Bowers and DiPiazza have looked competent so far; if the clause is changed to exclude debt service, RSE's clause would also have to be changed to define "team operating losses" more precisely. So either 2 changes, or none. That's assuming the city's out clause stays there at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad