Dado
Guest
On a napkin, without interest, the subsidy comparison is roughly QC $270MM CAD vs Glendale $590MM USD; all figures in 2013 dollars.
The total arena cost in QC is going to be around $1.2B ($500M build, 30 years @ 4% financing, 1%/year maintenance, on average, over 30 years).
That's about $40M/year benefit, over the same 30 years, to whoever is going to drop a team in there. Back out the $5M to $15M, depending, money flowing back from Quebecor, and we're left with a net benefit of approx $750M, that taxpayers will be responsible for.
And if that's how they want to spend their money, that's totally cool with me...
Look, at the end of the day, the only question that really matters is this: would Quebecor pay $170M for a team if they also had to provide their own arena? If the answer is "yes", then it's a more viable market than Phoenix, no question. But if the answer is "No", then it, too, is an non-viable market, and all we're arguing about it degrees of non-viability.
And the answer is clearly "No".
Last edited by a moderator: