Killion
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2010
- 36,763
- 3,219
Yes - one of the fireman that lost their jobs
... nice try kihekah.
Yes - one of the fireman that lost their jobs
They have to wait until the TRO expires on the 29th.Well that didn't take too long.
I guess Mr. Bailey gave good advice to the council after all.
How long now until that letter is filed to AI ?
Coyotes will look elsewhere if they lose lawsuit.....
http://www.tsn.ca/coyotes-will-eye-other-cities-if-team-loses-lawsuit-1.310073
Interesting note regarding Barroway
Let's not forget the over due audit that still hasn't been release.Oh, and is it possible the "bad actors" refer to the numerous violations of Open Meeting Law to influence the councilors who voted in favor of the agreement? (above)
Elliot Spitzer before his fall from grace.Never write when you can talk. Never talk when you can nod.
And never put anything in an e-mail.
GLENDALE, ARIZONA - The Arizona Coyotes issued the following statement today:
"We expect the City of Glendale to honor its contractual commitments. We intend to continue to honor ours."
The version I'm more familiar with is...
- if the law is on your side, pound on the law
- if the facts are on your side, pound on the facts
- if neither the law nor the facts are on your side, then pound on the table
What is the timeline of the lawsuit? I can't imagine the NHL wants this hanging over the draft and free agency, but time was already short.
That Westhead article makes it sounds like IA has no intention of re negotiating.
COYOTES STATEMENT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
Coyotes keep the media blitz going....
Here is Glendale's full statement following today's executive session of the City Council: The Glendale City Council held an Executive Session meeting this afternoon to discuss the city's management agreement with the Arizona Coyotes. Following the meeting, Glendale Interim Assistant City Manager Tom Duensing said: "Let's be clear. This isn't about hockey. We want the Arizona Coyotes in Glendale and we want them to succeed. As we've consistently indicated to the team, we are prepared to negotiate a mutually beneficial approach to address concerns."
Duensing went on to say, "This issue is about the law and the process and to ensure the law is followed. We have an obligation to the law and to the citizens first. We continue to believe in the strength of our case which is rooted in facts. Over time, those facts will come out. But they'll only come out in the appropriate venue, and that's a court of law.
"Please know, we have not and will not litigate this case in the media," Duensing said.
Only one home preseason game for the Coyotes this fall. Definitely in response to what has unfolded this past week.
COYOTES STATEMENT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
GLENDALE, ARIZONA - The Arizona Coyotes issued the following statement today:
"We expect the City of Glendale to honor its contractual commitments. We intend to continue to honor ours."
Coyotes keep the media blitz going....
Most likely no correlation to what has unfolded, they've had only one in the past. Nobody goes to preseason, depressing, but true.
They go during the regular season?
For 600,000 people to generate $2.5 million in sales taxes, each person would have to produce an average of $4.17 in sales tax. Glendale's retail sales-tax rate is 2.9 percent, meaning each person would have to spend $143.68 on retail items at Westgate. That number falls to $106.84 if those customers spend money only at restaurants and bars, where the local sales tax is 3.9 percent.
That figure assumes each person visiting Westgate is a unique paying customer. It does not account for non-paying adults, children or repeat attendees who visit Westgate. The more non-paying customers, the more money paying customers would have to spend to generate $2.5 million in sales tax.
Headline: Glendale shoots itself in the other foot.
Didn't Sherwood say that it would be the opposite? That council was going to reverse their decision? Sounds like a certain councillor has been sidelined, being fed disinformation....
Follow-up article: Glendale won't back down on killing Coyotes arena deal
Source: http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...oyotes-arena-deal-executive-session/28820491/
Didn't Sherwood say that it would be the opposite? That council was going to reverse their decision? Sounds like a certain councillor has been sidelined, being fed disinformation....
It was the Coyotes, but I get the impression they got their information from Sherwood.
Coyotes will look elsewhere if they lose lawsuit.....
http://www.tsn.ca/coyotes-will-eye-other-cities-if-team-loses-lawsuit-1.310073
Interesting note regarding Barroway
Also interesting that this source is dismissing a return downtown.
Either way, an NHL source dismissed the possibility that the Coyotes might return to the U.S. Airways Center this year.
"There's just not enough time, the schedule is out in a week, and the schedule for the arena is already booked up with NBA and arena football, it can't work," the source said
Again, I would love this thing to go to discovery. Can you imagine Sherwood being exposed for all the 'less-than-totally-straight-forward' dealings he was involved with in the last negotiation? It would be a glorious day of truth winning over deception.
Of course, Glendale as a city would look very foolish, or at least the prior council. But the current council, attorney, and manager seem to want to shoot straight. Finally.