Wetcoaster
Guest
Territorial Rights fees paid?Please explain the proximity between the Rangers, Islanders, and Devils please. Thanks in advance.
Territorial Rights fees paid?Please explain the proximity between the Rangers, Islanders, and Devils please. Thanks in advance.
Please explain the proximity between the Rangers, Islanders, and Devils please. Thanks in advance.
4.3 Territorial Rights of Members. Each member shall have exclusive control of the playing of hockey games within its home territory. ... No other member of the League shall be permitted to play games (except regularly scheduled games with the home club) in the home territory of a member without the latter member's consent.
I was under the impression that Balsillie would be paying rent to Hamilton for the Copps Coliseum. I thought I also read that Balsillie was contributing money to the upgrade costs.
Am I mistaken?
That is not correct.
Article 4.1 of the NHL’s constitution states that “each member shall have exclusive territorial rights in the city in it is located and within 50 miles of that city’s corporate limitsâ€.
A team in Hamilton infringes both Buffalo and Toronto's territorial rights.
Please explain the proximity between the Rangers, Islanders, and Devils please. Thanks in advance.
IIRC the Devils also had to compensate the Flyers at the time of the relocation from Colorado.The Rangers consented to the Isles and both consented to the Devils after being paid territorial rights fees.
IIRC the Devils also had to compensate the Flyers at the time of the relocation from Colorado.
Thanks for the clarification. Advancing senility sometimes affects my recall.Yes - but that was actually a payment for infringing upon Philadelphia's TV rights. East Rutherford, NJ was outside of the Flyers' Home Territory.
Is MLB better off having the Mets or Royals??
Is the NFL better off having the Giants or Cheifs??
It's quite obvious where the best location for a team would be. In all these situations the big market teams have obviously increased the financial health of the league.
So again if I'm an NHL owner outside of Buffalo/Toronto, how do the benefits of voting for Balsille and Hamilton and loosing the ability to dictate where teams are based and how they are moved outweigh sticking with my already established partners ,and relocation to KC or Vegas, or even PHX staying put.
Roll call/web sites for Wednesday's 9am (12 noon ET) hearing:
phoenixcoyotes.com - plans to update through the day.
HF BOH mod mouser plans to be at hearing and posting here.
From posts, these guys/gals look like they'll be in court room tomorrow:
http://twitter.com/HKYFN
http://twitter.com/TheYotesDiva
http://twitter.com/brahmresnik
Additionally, in 4.1 home territories can not overlap. This means at a minimum, teams must be 100 miles from another team's city limits. In the case of the Islanders they paid an infringement fee to the Rangers. The Devils paid the Islanders, the Rangers and the Flyers.
Finally, some actual news? I can't bear to read even half of the posts here nowadays.
GHOST
He'll want to punt, again. Why should he rule on over-ruling the NHL's ownership vote until the auction? Only then, after using JB's bid for maximum effect on other bidders (note the NHL made a bid) is he forced to reflect on whether or not he should accept it.
Only problem, if he does not rule on JB's eligibility, will the NHL not go over his head, seek a stay, and force the issue prior to any auction? Who wants to bid against bogus bidders? Is this EBay?
I can see a scenario where he rules JB can bid, NHL appeals and auction delayed; he rules JB cannot bid, JB appeals and auction delayed.
Hello Canada, and hockey fans in the United States and Newfoundland…
I can see a scenario where he rules JB can bid, NHL appeals and auction delayed; he rules JB cannot bid, JB appeals and auction delayed.
To win, Balsillie would have to prove the league's objection to relocating the team to Hamilton is it creates unwanted competition for the Buffalo Sabres and Toronto Maple Leafs.
"A court could conceivably order the NHL to add another team [in Hamilton] or give him the right to buy another team or may just award him money damages," Ross said, noting that such litigation could take up to four years at an estimated cost of $10 million US to Balsillie.
Both legal experts agreed Balsillie burned his bridges with the league when he previously tried — and failed — to buy the Penguins and Nashville Predators so he could move them to southern Ontario.
Attorneys for the debtors group that is headed by Moyes filed objections Tuesday arguing that the NHL and Ice Edge bid should be rejected by the judge.
that i am sure of RR one way or another we are now seeing round 2 opening shots , still hope best for Pho fans and maybe NHL cave in and sell Jb a hamilton expansion and all is good.
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/story/2009/09/01/sp-nhl-coyotes-balsillie.html?ref=rss
CBC previews Wednesday hearing.
WRT Balsillie being allowed to bid against NHL's rejection as potential owner (and able to pull anti-trust into the equation)....
Balsillie later agreed to purchase the Predators for $238 million US from Craig Leipold in 2007, and began a season-ticket drive in Hamilton when Leipold had second thoughts and scuttled the deal.
NHL may only bid $140m, but Balsillie's bid would incur an additional creditor (City of Glendale due to breaking Jobing.com lease) with perhaps two times his bid's amount, there by decreasing the amount paid to unsecured creditors so they get pennies on the dollar rather than about a dollar from the NHL bid.