MrMastodonFarm*
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2004
- 6,207
- 0
Well, thankfully everyone else in the hockey world does.Seachd said:In fact, right now I'm not sure what sets Phaneuf apart from guys like Grebeshkov and Tyutin. .
Well, thankfully everyone else in the hockey world does.Seachd said:In fact, right now I'm not sure what sets Phaneuf apart from guys like Grebeshkov and Tyutin. .
Oh ya, don't forget the small frame, ineffectiveness in his own end. That also seperates them.Seachd said:Don't forget talent and numbers.
Umm... You're bringing up size? Boyd's about an inch taller and ten pounds lighter than Schremp. Maybe you thought Schremp was smaller than he actually is? Or that Boyd was bigger?MrMastodonFarm said:Oh ya, don't forget the small frame, ineffectiveness in his own end. That also seperates them.
Should I bring up attitude problem? Nah, that will send you off the deep end.
Thought Boyd was bigger, he sure plays like a bigger guy though, its great! Schremp could learn a thing or two about how to do that then.Seachd said:Umm... You're bringing up size? Boyd's about an inch taller and ten pounds lighter than Schremp. Maybe you thought Schremp was smaller than he actually is? Or that Boyd was bigger?
.
Nope, I don't know the guy personally so I can't comment on his attitude problem. Can you?Seachd said:Anyway, I still haven't really heard any examples of these problems, and I doubt you could be the first to do that.
MrMastodonFarm said:Well, thankfully everyone else in the hockey world does.
vb said:Well this has gone fairly off track hasn't it
Phaneuf looks like he'll be player, but these prospects rankings change so quickly I wouldn't rely on them too much. For last year's draft the rankings were Cobourn, Phaneuf, Suter, at the draft it went, Suter, Coburn, Phaneuf, and now the "hockey world" says Phaneuf, Suter, Coburn according to you.
I'm pessimistic to say the least.
As for the Flames overall core, they do have potential and some balance, but I can't see them becoming a premier core. If every teams young defeceman pan out, I would give the edge to Phoenix or Florida or Nashville or...
XxPhaneufxX said:Great start for phaneuf, even though it was at the cost of the hitmen.
2 goals, 1 assist on the winner, and first star.
chriss_co said:I was excited about that too... what was his +/-?
Most likely not, but he probably would improve on 9th.Velouria said:one goal in game two........the guy is amazing
If they did the 2003 draft today, he would go number one overall, no doubt
Seachd said:Most likely not, but he probably would improve on 9th.
When did I bash Phaneuf? If you're able to, please show me. Besides, being a Rebels fan, I don't really have any reason to.the-rasta-masta said:Why don't you (along with vb) take off your copper colored glasses and try to stop your blatant bias on this matter. It's pretty obvious the only reason you too are bashing Phaneuf is because he is Flames property.
vb said:If he can't make the play at the most crucial time of his career til now, when is he going to make it?
Will Sutter play him in the situation again? Would you?
How did Seachd bash Phaneuf? I don't think it's that far a stretch to say that at least Fleury (and possibly a few more guys) would have still been drafted ahead of Phaneuf. Granted he's had a great start to the season but that doesn't suddenly make him the greatest thing since miracle whip...the-rasta-masta said:Why don't you (along with vb) take off your copper colored glasses and try to stop your blatant bias on this matter. It's pretty obvious the only reason you too are bashing Phaneuf is because he is Flames property.
Agreed... there is definitely a strong chance that Phaneuf would go in the top 4 if the draft was held again today. It's ironic that a guy with Phaneuf in his name is the one to point this out...XxPhaneufxX said:Wow, I know they are oiler fans, but I do agree with the fact that he would not be #1. I personally think he would be a top 4 if the draft was redone.
I would have taken quite a few ahead of Phaneuf, even in hindsight.Velouria said:one goal in game two........the guy is amazing
If they did the 2003 draft today, he would go number one overall, no doubt
Just curious, who would you have taken? I would have definitely taken a few ahead of Phaneuf but I can't think of many I'd rank ahead of him...Jacobv2 said:I would have taken quite a few ahead of Phaneuf, even in hindsight.
Cerebral said:Just curious, who would you have taken? I would have definitely taken a few ahead of Phaneuf but I can't think of many I'd rank ahead of him...
the-rasta-masta said:Why don't you (along with vb) take off your copper colored glasses and try to stop your blatant bias on this matter. It's pretty obvious the only reason you too are bashing Phaneuf is because he is Flames property.
Cerebral said:Just curious, who would you have taken? I would have definitely taken a few ahead of Phaneuf but I can't think of many I'd rank ahead of him...