Tomatoes11
Registered User
- Dec 25, 2021
- 1,595
- 994
Imagine thinking Miller for Barzal was worth even bringing up. Miller is very good, but he's not a comparable asset to Barzal.
Pettersson for Barzal makes sense as a change in scenery trade if the teams are pessimistic about their player signing long-term. I think with the additional year, Pettersson is a marginally more valuable asset, but the trade would be in the reasonable range.
All I am saying is it make more sense for us. Not sure what got you and your gf Bruce’s panties in a bunch. Lol
It wasn’t a trade suggestion, just a comment that a Miller package for Barzal would make more sense than trading Ep due to Barzal’s contract expiring the same year as miller and Horvat.