People wanted to buy out Zucker too. What's your point?
Zucker's issue was always his inability to stay healthy. He never had time to settle into a role as he was always either dealing with a nagging injury, completely on the shelf with an injury, or recently returning from injury. I'm still not entirely sold that his injury issues are behind him or that he'll keep up his impressive production, but he was never as bad as Kap's been for a full season-plus. You keep saying Zucker's only playing and/or trying hard because he has a contract on the line. What was Kap's excuse last year?
This is such a weird contrarian/devil's advocate approach to the Kap situation--refusing any possibility that maybe he's just, in the end. a mediocre or downright bad player who has been playing poorly for a calendar year. It's like you're arguing just to argue. I'm not sure you actually genuinely believe any of the stuff you're saying.
We agree on pretty much everything, Sullivan is a coach years beyond his expiration date. We agree that Kap's underperforming and dumping him is the best course of action. The difference is that I don't think Sullivan's eroded the game of some effective player, I think Kap was always mediocre at best and just isn't getting those hot streaks anymore. You're near-obsession with Sully lately and the way you just kinda default to "Sully bad, he's responsible for everything" and I think it lacks a whole lot of the nuance you were referring to a few weeks ago.
The most likely reality here is that this team's got a coach who won't do Kap any favors, and a player who is giving his coach absolutely zero reason to. Plenty of fault on both sides.