Megna and Gibbons are better 4th liners than Engelland. I don't care how tough Engo is. Hell, go with Zolnierczyk or Sill even. Do not bring back Engo.
.
i'm trying to upgrade the softness factor of the team. get the team to being hard to play against again
megna or gibbons on the 4th line are not the solution to that problem
yeah, i like those guys too except maybe for Goc. but if they use sutter as trADE bait, then i'd have him back.
it really can be an easy fix and we dont have to tinker much outside the roster.
play engo on the 4th line and let him be aggressive. have JV as the center and the other wing at least a hitter or a bigger guy that can help with the size issue. or even someone like dorrsett, carcillo,prust type... thats a 4th line that you can roll with even in the playoffs
the 3rd line is more of a problem
on the defense. let niskinnen walk. play bort and despres. two big, young aggressive guys with the first call up being another big body in Dumo. that size and aggressiveness will off set the play of some of the other D emn that seem like they dont want to take the body at all
the biggest problem is addressing it in the top 6. prolly requires a trade. sutter, prospect + ??
If this team didn't have leaches for their "top" three wingers, two sloths on their fourth line, and had their two big young blueliners in Despres and Bort in the lineup, they would look a lot more like the team all of us want.
I mean, there really isn't a big mystery as to what is making this team so dysfunctional, personnel wise.
You can be hard to play against by being fast and skilled too. But then again, Deryk Engelland's 1 inch and 7 pound advantage over Jayson Megna would probably make all the difference. Who cares if he's a worse hockey player in every other way.
you lost me.
i'll take that 1 inch and 7 LBs and be a whole hell of a lot tougher team. fighting still exists in this league
megna types on the 4th line is what the problem has been the last 2 years or so IMO.
its what the discussion in this thread has turned into.
you lost me.
i'll take that 1 inch and 7 LBs and be a whole hell of a lot tougher team. fighting still exists in this league
megna types on the 4th line is what the problem has been the last 2 years or so IMO.
its what the discussion in this thread has turned into.
glass adams = megna types
fringe NHLers that offer little toughness
on WBS
i'm trying to upgrade the softness factor of the team. get the team to being hard to play against again
megna or gibbons on the 4th line are not the solution to that problem
First off, I give a **** if some tool on the internet 'takes me seriously'.
Oh no, sacrificing a whole roster spot during the regular season! News for you bud, if your team relies on your 12th forward to win games for you, your team's ****ed. Adams isn't 10x the player of anyone, ever.
You must be referring to the Islanders game. The one where Rupp and Engelland got tossed right away? Right? So one Godard vs Gilles, Haley, and Konopka. And Godard still directly stopped our goalie from getting beat down by some plug. Got anything else?
Please post where I even mentioned John Scott in my life. I'll wait....
and what would they solve exactly in the colombus series?
would they come and and hit..so the jackets wouldnt double and triple out hit us. would they wake this team up showing them its not a figure skating contest
would they give a message to dubinsky?
this is the 4th line we're talking about here. have all the sppeed and skill you want in the top 6. i'm using my 4th line to set a tone
you are arguing we should play Engelland --a fringe NHLer at his actual position -- OUT OF POSITION, and then calling other players out for being fringe NHLers. Its ridiculous. I don't know how to argue with someone who is as wrong as you are.
Look at the roster from 09:
Kunitz-Crosby-Guerin
Feds-Malkin-Talbot
Cooke-Staal-Kennedy
Dupuis-Adams-Satan
None of those guys are enforcers but every wing (save Satan) were skilled yet gritty guys who most importantly were willing to get into the dirty areas and knock guys around. THAT is what we are missing. They had a combo of hitting, grit, and skill. Then look down the center, we had the best center depth in the league with two superstars and the best 3C in the league.
None of those guys were feared in the ring but, as Matt Cooke once said, there was no easy ice with any of them out there.
We don't need enforcers per say...we need 1. guys willing to get their noses dirty, 2. guys that have actual skill, and 3. to stop wasting money on family favorites like Adams and Dupuis. Even Kunitz to an extent was a mistake to resign that long.
It's not too hard to fix the roster. Problem is...we have to hurt some feelings and grow some balls to do it.
well, be happy with this roster then. feel joy for a team that doesnt even get up for playoff games cause they know they're getting their butts whipped physically.
go watch geno and sid play without emotion cause they have megna and 5'7 gibbons on the 4th line to dish out punishment
sadly, a majority of the fan base got its way
congrats!
that's great. You use your 4th line to set a tone. I'll use mine to help win hockey games. Hit totals don't mean a damn thing.
Are you saying you would play the 4th line -- the one including Engelland -- against Dubinsky and Johansson's line? They wouldn't send a message, they would need to catch him first to send a message. Maybe they could send it while he's celebrating his goal.
like the 2 game winner's carcillo scored for the rangers. you want more speed then england offers then go grab carcillo or someone similiar.
megna and gibbons on the 4th. are you trying to be the toughest team in a woman's league?
you honestly think the bottom 6's lack of size and physicality is why Sid and Geno are struggling in the top 6?
yes i do