I think Sullivan will make it so Fleury isn't happy with the amount of starts he's getting. Even JR waited to re-sign him in 2014. And JR tends to listen to Sullivan from what I read last season.
I think Sullivan will make it so Fleury isn't happy with the amount of starts he's getting. Even JR waited to re-sign him in 2014. And JR tends to listen to Sullivan from what I read last season.
It's funny, because all the things that Murray did in the playoffs, if Fleury had done them, Fleury would be getting praised for them. Such as the 6-0 after a loss. The two pressure packed wins, facing elimination vs. TB. Frustrating the Caps to the point that they specifically mentioned the goalie on "exit" interviews. Winning 15 games.
All those things would be exhibit A on how great Fleury is. But instead, Murray gets marginalized. Terms like, "insulated", "in spite of", "nothing Fleury wouldn't have done".
And of course IF Fleury HAD done all those things, would there even be a question of keeping him? It would be absurd to think of getting rid of him. He would be THE GUY. We would still be hoping to keep Murray, because he's good and he's young, but it would not be AS pressing. Because we wouldn't have seen him in the playoffs yet. So that part would still be a question. Fleury would have proved himself that he could deliver when it mattered most.
But that didn't happen. Murray carried the ball. And YET STILL, Fleury is the darling of the media/local fans.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
here's hoping. Fleury isn't playing well enough to make it a tough call for Sully to give Murray every chance to be the full starter as soon as he's back either.
People are stupid, man.
It's funny, because all the things that Murray did in the playoffs, if Fleury had done them, Fleury would be getting praised for them. Such as the 6-0 after a loss. The two pressure packed wins, facing elimination vs. TB. Frustrating the Caps to the point that they specifically mentioned the goalie on "exit" interviews. Winning 15 games.
All those things would be exhibit A on how great Fleury is. But instead, Murray gets marginalized. Terms like, "insulated", "in spite of", "nothing Fleury wouldn't have done".
And of course IF Fleury HAD done all those things, would there even be a question of keeping him? It would be absurd to think of getting rid of him. He would be THE GUY. We would still be hoping to keep Murray, because he's good and he's young, but it would not be AS pressing. Because we wouldn't have seen him in the playoffs yet. So that part would still be a question. Fleury would have proved himself that he could deliver when it mattered most.
But that didn't happen. Murray carried the ball. And YET STILL, Fleury is the darling of the media/local fans.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Also i should point out that the fluery defenders are probably just a balance for the fluery haters... The guy did get a **** ton of blame his whole career even when he played well... He isnt a hof player, but he isnt the worse goalie in the league... Or even bottom ten... He is average to above average and niether side of the arguement can accept that so it polarizes things
Also i should point out that the fluery defenders are probably just a balance for the fluery haters... The guy did get a **** ton of blame his whole career even when he played well... He isnt a hof player, but he isnt the worse goalie in the league... Or even bottom ten... He is average to above average and niether side of the arguement can accept that so it polarizes things
It's funny, because all the things that Murray did in the playoffs, if Fleury had done them, Fleury would be getting praised for them. Such as the 6-0 after a loss. The two pressure packed wins, facing elimination vs. TB. Frustrating the Caps to the point that they specifically mentioned the goalie on "exit" interviews. Winning 15 games.
All those things would be exhibit A on how great Fleury is. But instead, Murray gets marginalized. Terms like, "insulated", "in spite of", "nothing Fleury wouldn't have done".
And of course IF Fleury HAD done all those things, would there even be a question of keeping him? It would be absurd to think of getting rid of him. He would be THE GUY. We would still be hoping to keep Murray, because he's good and he's young, but it would not be AS pressing. Because we wouldn't have seen him in the playoffs yet. So that part would still be a question. Fleury would have proved himself that he could deliver when it mattered most.
But that didn't happen. Murray carried the ball. And YET STILL, Fleury is the darling of the media/local fans.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.