Post-Game Talk: Pens cook the Kraken

[tom_servo]

I wouldn't look at leading our PP in points as a good thing. Advertising that you are one of the 3 people who touched the puck most on that failure is...like, leave that aside. Not the endorsement you want.

Or they have the most success when he touches the puck.

I don't think you can tell anything from this stat. They're all culpable.

 

[Honour Over Glory]

The only one who doesn't grasp the situation is you. Seattle rolls four lines because they have productive players on all lines.

You can't give the 3rd line o zone face offs when the failed to score a point for what 12 games? The third line is playing better and getting more ice time.

Smith WAS relegated before the injury despite your revisionist history. And yes it was grudgingly no one wants a 5,000,000 third liner who has a history of being much better. I dont see you saying much about Rakell's previous usage now that he is scoring again.

I said before the coaching staff needed to be shot into the Sun but, it's not going to happen. So I will take the small victories. That being said I am at the point now I'm putting the PP on the players not the coaches. If you can't even gain the zone, that's not a coaching problem that's an execution problem and that's on them. They second PP usually doesn't have an issue getting into the zone.

Don't bother replying because I won't read any more of your gibberish.