Wilson wasnt there in 2016
Sheary - Sid - Horny
Kunitz - Geno - Rust
Hagelin - Bonino - Kessel
Kuhn - Cullen - Fehr
Doesnt matter if HBK came from injury
Kunitz - Bonino - Rust > McGinn - Carter - Kap
Kuhn - Cullen - Fehr > Poehling - TB - Archibald
The bottom six wingers were just better overall
I realize that but Wilson did play a significant number of regular season games for us. He got hurt late in the year though. IIRC, they were brought up and down in pairs. From Dec 15 to April 16, there was a healthy back and forth from the AHL for Sheary, Rust, Wilson, and Kuhnhackl.
And you're missing what I'm saying just a bit - no one is arguing that 2016 had better bottom 6 wings. They did. It's clear. What I am saying is a two-part response - we had better wings because:
1. We had 4 guys from WBS that were able to provide impact levels of play that allowed us to shift good wingers around. Fehr was a 2RW, 3C, 4C but after Rust really established his effectiveness, Fehr became 4RW and Rust became 2/3RW. We don't have that influx of cheap young players that allow us to push other guys to other lines. If Puustinen game in and gave us Sheary or Rust-esque play, that could allow you to move a Zucker, Rust, or Rakell to the 3rd line. Then McGinn and Kapanen to the 4th line. I don't think McGinn or Kapanen are any worse than Kuhn or Fehr.
2. That circumstance is very rare. Yes, it's great to move 4-5 guys from WBS to the NHL roster but that's an exceedingly rare thing to accomplish. I can't remember the last time a cup contender did something like that so I'm suggesting it's not a realistic expectation to set for 2022-23 bottom 6.
I would suggest getting a guy like Poehling and Heinen are moves in that mold. Either of them can easily get us Kuhnhackl and Fehr levels of performance. Kuhnhackl was hardly special. Same for Fehr. Now Cullen, I mean...yeah, we squeezed the last bit of hockey he still had to give. Not unlike we are doing with Carter right now. So the direction is similar. Results vary. Such is life.
I mean we do have two of them and they are playing really well for us in Poehling and POJ. That's why I would give Poehling, Carter because I think they have similar archetypes as players versus force-feeding Blueger minutes.
That's why I want a DOC / Hallander - Poehling - Carter fourth line. Because it gives you a vet who can handle face-offs and also has had a big impact on young players previously with Toffoli and Pearson and he also can still chip in production so you aren't have a total net zero there.
Could easily see that line rocketing off and then you have a McGinn - Barbashev type - Kapanen line that can actually be defensively responsible while being an offensive threat.
Versus what we have now which is L3 which is offensively inclined but not really that much and L4 which is defensively inclined but will never score. Although that's kinda sully's favorite thing since 2018.
Does DOC-Poehling-Carter give us a better result than Poehling-Bleuger-Archibald?
I'm not even totally convinced that McGinn-Blueger-Kapanen would even be that much more impactful than McGinn-Carter-Kapanen.
And weren't you literally just telling everyone that Carter's performance thus far has been fine as a defensive-minded 3C?