Fish on The Sand
Untouchable
would have been nice if we went 1-2Yes Im Peter Ing said:Thank God Mtl or Ottawa didn't get them.
I was nearing a heart attack when they made it into the top-10.
would have been nice if we went 1-2Yes Im Peter Ing said:Thank God Mtl or Ottawa didn't get them.
I was nearing a heart attack when they made it into the top-10.
Vlad The Impaler said:Yeah. My whole opinion is based on Mario Lemieux
Please. I'll say the same for any team that tanks. If you haven't noticed this is happening more often than before and if you aren't worried, good for you. But I am.
Classy, very classy.sawtooth420 said:hey Vlad....HHHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA Sorry buddy, maybe next time! HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA
LETS GO PENS
66+87+17(MALKIN...wink wink)=
Evilo said:Vlad has every right to think the Pens tanked.
He simply doesn't understand the Pens' financial situation in details, and there's nothing wrong with that.
The thing is simple : when you don't want to lose money, and you barely break even with money trades, then you can't do anything else.
You fail to realize that the Pittsburgh Penguins DO have the money to get a top-tier free agent and have one of the highest payrolls in the NHL. Every single owner could go out and have a $100 Million payroll. They could spend just as much as the Rangers. That's why they are owners of an NHL team. They shower with $100 bills. They are filthy, filthy rich. But they didn't get that way by spending $100 Million on an NHL team, and then losing $80 Million. The myth that NHL owners can't "afford" a $50 Million payroll is a hilarious, it's just that they aren't willing to spend that money on a hockey team. They have so much money it's unbelievable. They have the money. They're just not willing to spend it.Unholy Diver said:let me try to explain things in lay terms for you people that can not seem to understand the penguins situation
if you are making 9.50$ an hour you do not go out and buy a $750,000 home but you find an apartment that you can afford maybe for 400$ a month
so are people in the small apartments "tanking"? no they are living within their means
you can not spend money that you do not have
and as for the Pens being "so bad" as Dan Briere says, well the Sabres have made it out of the 1st round of the playoffs just as many times as the Pens have so are the Sabres "all time cellar dwellers"? did the Sabres "tank" when the blew game 7 in the cup finals a few years back?
you people have no idea what the Pens situation is or was and your hatred for the team will keep it that way
Broadway Crosby said:You fail to realize that the Pittsburgh Penguins DO have the money to get a top-tier free agent and have one of the highest payrolls in the NHL. Every single owner could go out and have a $100 Million payroll. They could spend just as much as the Rangers. That's why they are owners of an NHL team. They shower with $100 bills. They are filthy, filthy rich. But they didn't get that way by spending $100 Million on an NHL team, and then losing $80 Million. The myth that NHL owners can't "afford" a $50 Million payroll is a hilarious, it's just that they aren't willing to spend that money on a hockey team. They have so much money it's unbelievable. They have the money. They're just not willing to spend it.
You seem to be making pretty ridiculous, sweeping generalizations about NHL owners. Not all are multibillionaires that use $100 bills to light their cigars. Unholy Diver made the point in that teams need to live within their means. If the Penguins have been struggling to stay afloat on a measly payroll, how can they afford a $50 million one? Makes no sense.Broadway Crosby said:You fail to realize that the Pittsburgh Penguins DO have the money to get a top-tier free agent and have one of the highest payrolls in the NHL. Every single owner could go out and have a $100 Million payroll. They could spend just as much as the Rangers. That's why they are owners of an NHL team. They shower with $100 bills. They are filthy, filthy rich. But they didn't get that way by spending $100 Million on an NHL team, and then losing $80 Million. The myth that NHL owners can't "afford" a $50 Million payroll is a hilarious, it's just that they aren't willing to spend that money on a hockey team. They have so much money it's unbelievable. They have the money. They're just not willing to spend it.
All of them are multimillionaires, and most are billionaires. The owners can afford a $50 Million payroll, because of how rich they are, but they wouldn't because it would not be a smart investment.The Maltais Falcon said:You seem to be making pretty ridiculous, sweeping generalizations about NHL owners. Not all are multibillionaires that use $100 bills to light their cigars. Unholy Diver made the point in that teams need to live within their means. If the Penguins have been struggling to stay afloat on a measly payroll, how can they afford a $50 million one? Makes no sense.
P.S. - Please change your username. Thanks.
Spooner said:Healthy Lemieux + Recchi + Fleury (maybe) + Crosby + HEAVILY reduced ticket prices = packed house every night = new arena...
I don't think I can understate how important this is for the Pens. It may very well save the franchise. I half expect Crosby to get to Mellon Arena by walking across the Three Rivers.
bit82 said:Hopefully Crosby can keep up the "best player in the NHL is in Pittsburgh" thing. Since the late 80's Mario was the best player. After he retired, Jagr was the best player, and when Mario came back, he took over as the best player in the league and still is. The Penguins have had the best player in the nhl every year for well over 15 years now. Hopefully after MArio retires, Crosby will be the best in the league to keep up having the best player in the league wearing a Pens jersey.
mmbt said:Yeah, but isn't it a little sad that even in spite of that, the franchise has been in serious trouble? A team shouldn't have to have the best player in the league on its roster to stay afloat.
Just like Lemieux saved the franchise?Spooner said:I don't think I can understate how important this is for the Pens. It may very well save the franchise. I half expect Crosby to get to Mellon Arena by walking across the Three Rivers.
mmbt said:Yeah, but isn't it a little sad that even in spite of that, the franchise has been in serious trouble? A team shouldn't have to have the best player in the league on its roster to stay afloat.
<Mr Jiggyfly> said:The Pens got into their situation because of one man's greed.
mmbt said:None of which changes the basic premise that it shouldn't come down to the best player in the league to, "save the franchise," constantly.
They're hardly the first franchise to suffer because of bad ownership, but other teams with bad owners haven't always been lucky enough to have even one talent of that caliber, nevermind three. They're not the only team out there who haven't had control of their own arena. They're not the only team with an owner who didn't want to pay for a new arena themselves.
Count yourselves lucky ... a lot of teams in not as bad of shape as the Penguins ended up moving altogether. At least you folks still have your team.
b-mad said:Uh, vlad, u do realize that the league now has a minimum payroll now to go with a cap to keep teams from totally unloading don't you?
b-mad said:And as for you harping on teams "tanking" I know you're referring alot to what WAS did....well given that they were in near last place with about a $50 mill payroll and knowing the CBA was expiring and the owners were dead set on a reasonable cap (which they apparently were) they'd look pretty damn stupid right now having finished at best the 9-10th worst team in the league and now having to buyout contracts ala philly did today with LeClair and Amonte and a very bleak future wouldn't they? Now they have a bright future and plenty of cap space to build a decent team.
b-mad said:I really used to have alotta respect for your opinions but after your rambling on this thread (and a couple others) I really lost alot of it.
turnbuckle said:What a surprise. A huge day for the Pittsburgh franchise (congratulations), and what should have been a classy thread offering congratulations gets hijacked by Vlad and his own personal agenda.
Vlad The Impaler said:Also, they've shrunked the gap in salaries at both ends. Superstars make less, AHL hacks will make more.
mmbt said:Yeah, but isn't it a little sad that even in spite of that, the franchise has been in serious trouble? A team shouldn't have to have the best player in the league on its roster to stay afloat.