turd
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2013
- 2,943
- 1,387
I think you and I have different definitions of "good". Paying Schultz $5.5 million after he had 1 good year isn't "good". Letting all of those guys walk in 2017. while not addressing the holes they left, isn't "good". The Brassard trade hasn't panned out at all, same with the Rust extension.
The Brassard trade was great. That it hasn't worked yet isn't on JR. On paper, you can't argue that move. It'd be like if Hossa had come here in 07-08 and bombed. Would you have blamed Shero? He still gave up jack **** for a very good asset, so on paper, a great move.
As for Schultz, 5.5 is basically market value for what he was doing. So hard to call it a bad deal.
Letting those guys walk was good. Bones would have been overpaid for what he did. Cullen walking was just bad luck. No way to assume he would decide at the last moment to go elsewhere. At best you can say JR should have had a better back up plan for Bones/Cullen walking, but I think his backup plan was Cullen and he didn't anticipate Cullen screwing him like that. It happens.
If there was an organisational confusion over whether Hossa was a C or a W the next year, then yeah, I'd have blamed Shero.
This is the thing with Brass. For the beginning, the organisation has looked unsure as to what they wanted from him and that escalated rapidly over the summer. There is no move so good that it can't be made bad through organisational dithering.
Isn't that more on Sullivan, though? JR got Brassard to be the 3c. If Sully has other ideas, that's on him.
Every indication I've ever heard about coach/GM relationships in hockey is that the GM hires the coach and then is largely hands off and lets the coach decide how to deploy players. The GM might give input but they don't dictate.
So Brassards usage is on one man for me, and that's Sully.