Confirmed with Link: Penguins avoid arbitration with Dumoulin for another 6 years AAV $4.1million

Penske

Kunitz wasn't there
Jan 13, 2016
5,262
2
6 years boom! Not a bad AAV early on and will look better as the years go on
 

3074326

Registered User
Apr 9, 2009
11,608
11,050
USA
The contract might seem a little high now, but it's a six year deal. By the end of it, if he continues to improve, he will be an excellent defenseman and the contract will be great.

We know what we're getting with Dumo. He brings something we need. And he can bring it for six years.
 

Tender Rip

Wears long pants
Feb 12, 2007
17,999
5,221
Shanghai, China
In 2 years this will look freaking beautiful.

I suppose that is the way to look at it.
We are paying a million or so too much in the next two years - half a million for sure - to pay a million or so less in the last four.

But it will look beautiful only if Dumo adds some offense to his game. In that case, yes. Otherwise it is merely a decent, fair value, contract. But I suppose expecting more than that is also being spoiled.

Honestly though, I am surprised JR didn't prioritize the short term cap efficiency.

Think it is more likely that Sheary or Hags are bait now, and no one should expect any extension for Conor.
 

OnMyOwn

Worlds Apart
Sep 7, 2005
18,906
4,563
This number hurts in the short term, but he's a solid top 4 defensive d so I'm not upset and it'll look better in the coming years.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,557
25,396
Seems a little high considering his complete and total lack of offensive talent but oh well.

I had been of that way of thinking but when Alzner got 4.5m in free agency, I stopped thinking that way.

Imagine this deal being like we'd signed Dumo to a 4 x 4.5m when he hit free agency after having him for 2 x 3.3m as an RFA. Think the numbers work out there. That's what we've done with the cap hit being averaged out. Seems fair and sensible to me.

edit: p.s. While the number may hurt in the short term, the Pens look so comfy within the cap for the next two years it doesn't really matter.
 

UnderratedBrooks44

Registered User
Sep 13, 2005
17,564
315
Miranda's house
I had been of that way of thinking but when Alzner got 4.5m in free agency, I stopped thinking that way.

Imagine this deal being like we'd signed Dumo to a 4 x 4.5m when he hit free agency after having him for 2 x 3.3m as an RFA. Think the numbers work out there. That's what we've done with the cap hit being averaged out. Seems fair and sensible to me.

edit: p.s. While the number may hurt in the short term, the Pens look so comfy within the cap for the next two years it doesn't really matter.

Yeah was just gonna mention Alzner. Pretty much ends the conversation there. Plus we've got a guy like Hunwick making about $1 million less than what people wanted Dumo to get. No way. Solid D make $4+ million. Just the way it is.
 

radapex

Registered User
Sep 21, 2012
7,766
528
Canada, Eh
Most def who produce such little offense don't get payed this much, Smith did, but most don't.

Its not an awful deal, just a little more then i'd like.

Some comparables from the past few months:

Dmitry Kulikov, WPG - 3 years @ $4,333,333 +M-NTC
2016-17 BUF: 47 GP, 2 G, 3 A, 5 PTS, -26
2015-16 FLA: 74 GP, 1 G, 16 A, 17 PT, +8
2014-15 FLA: 73 GP, 3 G, 19 A, 22 PTS, -26
2013-14 FLA: 81 GP, 8 G, 11 A, 19 PTS, -26

Karl Alzner, MTL - 5 years @ $4,625,000 +M-NTC
2016-17 WSH: 82 GP, 3 G, 10 A, 13 PTS, +23
2015-16 WSH: 82 GP, 4 G, 17 A, 21 PTS, +14
2014-15 WSH: 82 GP, 5 G, 16 A, 21 PTS, +14
2013-14 WSH: 82 GP, 2 G, 16 A, 18 PTS, -7

Brendan Smith, NYR - 4 years @ $4,350,000 +M-NTC
2016-17 DET/NYR: 51 GP, 3 G, 6 A, 10 PTS, +1
2015-16 DET: 63 GP, 3 G, 12 A, 15 PTS, +1
2014-15 DET: 76 GP, 4 G, 9 A, 13 PTS, -2
2013-14 DET: 71 GP, 5 G, 14 A, 19 PTS, -2

Kris Russell, EDM - 4 years @ $4,000,000 +NMC +M-NTC
2016-17 EDM: 68 GP, 1 G, 12 A, 13 PTS, +5
2015-16 CGY/DAL: 62 GP, 4 G, 15 A, 19 PTS, -5
2014-15 CGY: 79 GP, 4 G, 30 A, 34 PTS, +18
2013-14 CGY: 68 GP, 7 G, 22 A, 29 PTS, -11


Russell is kind of a strange case because he did have those two really productive seasons with Calgary - but those appear to be outliers compared to the rest of his career.
 
Last edited:

Dr Frasier Crane

Registered User
Oct 16, 2008
14,275
12
Boston, MA
Some of you have said it - it is probably a little less than $1M high for the next two years, but with the cap increasing every year and just entering his prime, we should really benefit from the last 3 years.

And he'll still get to cash in again at 31.
 

kodoshin

Registered User
Mar 26, 2007
610
97
My expectations were: 3.5- Dumoulin needs to fire his agent. 4.5- Rutherford got taken to the cleaners. 4.0- Perfect.
 

RizzleMcRib

Cheeseburgers and rocket ships.
Jun 17, 2014
1,112
499
Wherever there are cheeseburgers.
Seems a little high considering his complete and total lack of offensive talent but oh well.

We have enough people to score goals. We don't really need them from Dumoulin. I know +/- can be a misleading stat, but he has never been a - player. I would much rather pay him 4.1 rather than someone who puts up points like Mike Green for 6 a year or a guy like Phaneuf for 7.
 

radapex

Registered User
Sep 21, 2012
7,766
528
Canada, Eh
We have enough people to score goals. We don't really need them from Dumoulin. I know +/- can be a misleading stat, but he has never been a - player. I would much rather pay him 4.1 rather than someone who puts up points like Mike Green for 6 a year or a guy like Phaneuf for 7.

All Dumoulin really needs to do is continue to play that Methot-style role as a stay-at-home partner for Letang/Schultz. Anything above that is a bonus. But having that reliably steady defensive partner can allow Letang/Schultz the freedom to do what they do best.
 

Dr Frasier Crane

Registered User
Oct 16, 2008
14,275
12
Boston, MA
It's really not though, as explained by radapex above.

Not sure how comparing UFAs, where teams are bidding against the entire league, to an RFA on the verge of arbitration, where you're bidding against no one, by showing offensive totals for a defenseman is fair, but okay.

EDIT: And I'm happy with the contract!
 
Last edited:

CertifiedLurker

Registered User
Aug 13, 2016
869
182
AAV is alright, not great but not bad either. I think its pretty obvious that Dumoulin had to get a significant extension, defense is not a position this team has in abundance and even if he's not anything special offensively, he's adequate defensively. Don't think Sheary will be getting a contract like that, although if he does, I don't expect some wingers to be retained over the next 2 seasons (Hagelin, probably Hornqvist :cry: ).
 

radapex

Registered User
Sep 21, 2012
7,766
528
Canada, Eh
It's really not though, as explained by radapex above.

It is. If you take those 4 comparables, the average AAV is about $4.33-mil (gee, I wonder where Dumoulin got his request from!). Adjusting for cap inflation using 5% growth (ie: assuming the escalator clause is invoked each year) gives us the following:
  • 2017: $4.33-mil
  • 2018: $4.55-mil
  • 2019: $4.77-mil (this is where Dumo turns UFA)
  • 2020: $5.01-mil
  • 2021: $5.26-mil
  • 2022: $5.53-mil

So that $4.33-mil Dumoulin comparable right now, following inflation to when he's slated to turn UFA in 2023, would be going for about $5.80-mil.

In essence, the "$1-mil over to $1-mil under" statement is pretty accurate. They're overpaying him by probably $500-$800k these next two seasons to save $600k+ over his 4 UFA years.
 

Penske

Kunitz wasn't there
Jan 13, 2016
5,262
2
I really really hope I'm wrong about this contract. That just seems like an abhorrent amount of risk in terms of cap hit and especially term. :(

Dumoulin should be a pretty safe bet for a long term deal. He probably won't get much better but he likely wouldn't be much worse than what he is now.
 

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,023
67,649
Pittsburgh
I suppose that is the way to look at it.
We are paying a million or so too much in the next two years - half a million for sure - to pay a million or so less in the last four.

But it will look beautiful only if Dumo adds some offense to his game. In that case, yes. Otherwise it is merely a decent, fair value, contract. But I suppose expecting more than that is also being spoiled.


Honestly though, I am surprised JR didn't prioritize the short term cap efficiency.

Think it is more likely that Sheary or Hags are bait now, and no one should expect any extension for Conor.

I disagree that he has to add more offense to his game. Not every player is a Schultz/Letang. There are Dumos of the world that play top 4 minutes and enable Letang/Schultz to do their thing.

And if he's 500k overpaid, would anyone actually let him walk for the 500k? I sure as hell would not.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad