Where did I say they'd be considered "failures" if they don't win?
Get off your high horse buddy....
Of course! No one expected the Caps to contend again, just like no one expected Vegas in the SCF. I want the Cup badly, but I won't say the season was unsuccessful if we don't get it.
When a butterfly flaps its wings it causes a tsunami and when a poster at HFB jinxes a team the team loses...Right. Because what I ask/ and or say on a message board affects the outcome....
Vegas's season is already a success. There's nothing they can do ( Short of blowing a 3-0 series lead) to diminish that.
What about the Caps? They weren't expected to be here. But they overcame a 2-0 hole to the Jackets, and shutout Tampa in games 6 & 7.
Disagree tbh.
I did have Pitt #1 but I had them as Dark horse #2 in east (maybe #3 after Tampa). There's something about losing at that high level that builds character. I liked the fact that both the Caps AND Ovechkin came into this season with no expectations really (most had written them off) after such a disappointing outcome last year.
I do think there's a ton of pressure on Caps to deliver the cup. I get most didn't see them in the finals - but considering all the great teams they've had in the Ovi era, they really need a cup. A finals and no cup will be disappointing - there's no guarantee you make it back next year (or anytime soon).
Of course! No one expected the Caps to contend again, just like no one expected Vegas in the SCF. I want the Cup badly, but I won't say the season was unsuccessful if we don't get it.
Tell that to the 95 Red Wings or 2011 Canucks. If there's high expectations for a team ( Not the Caps this season), anything short of a cup can be considered a "Unsuccessful".