Terry: "Phil's a young coach and he was a great player. I think he can grow as a coach."
Kim: " I don’t want to knee-jerk anything. I want to sit down and get the information....We have to make sure the decisions we make are based on sound decisions and that really can’t happen until we get all the information and that’s at the end of the season."
Pegulas need to sell one major team
Pegulas need to sell both major teams
There, fixed it.
I was reading the comments by Terry and Kim yesterday. Terry said his usual dimwitted nonsense, "let's wait and see" and "I don't know." Despite all the failure, he supported Kim as his Football/Hockey Czar. Laughably, Kim is going around the NFL asking other owners how they do it. Kim, do you really think the other owners will reveal their secrets it took them years to learn and tell you how they do it -- and encourage you to be anything other than a doormat?
Kim basically admitted that she is inexperienced and knows very little and is relying on other owners who help her learn on the job. This is not a good place to start, especially when owning two major league teams, let alone one.
I think they're starting to find out that Buffalo is a tough crowd.
Puts team success before his pocketbook... What team success are you refereeing to?Terry and Kim Pegula are the two greatest things to happen to this team and the city of Buffalo in a LONG time. Their investment in both has provided the positive boost that each has needed to take that next level. Just because their hires have failed us, doesn't mean they have.
People are complaining they don't have a "President of Hockey Operations", but who would hire that person? They are good at hiring Presidents of Hockey Operations but not GMs? They had Craig Patrick as a consultant, how did that work out? They had Pat LaFontaine (for 2 days), how did that work out? I am certain they had input from people inside the game when they picked Botterill too. They've tried to buy Babcock. They paid for the Stanley Cup winning Bylsma. They took a chance on the up and coming Housley.
Golisano's teams were successful because of Regier/Ruff and no real thanks to him. I appreciate him "saving the team" but playing under his budget is a big reason they lost "the captains" and not the GM. You want to go back to that type of ownership?
Anyway, the point is, Pegula is the only owner in my history with the Sabres that puts the team success before his pocketbook (legally *Rigas*). The owner's primary job is to pay the bills and they've done that better than we could have ever dreamed. One day they'll get the right GM and coach combo like they have in football and we'll all be happy again and the rest of you will finally appreciate what we have in ownership.
What on earth is she talking about? What information?
What information could possibly be available to them after 82 games that they don't already have after 76 games?
It's not like Game #82 is a magical event that suddenly lifts the veil and opens the eyes and reveals the secrets. Pretty much everything there is to know about this team is already known.
Puts team success before his pocketbook... What team success are you refereeing to?
We are absolutely awful and a joke around the league.
"The Buffalo Sabres' reason for existence is to win the Stanley Cup. We will aspire to be the best in the league at finding, developing and keeping players in the Buffalo Sabres family."Since Terry Purchased the Buffalo Sabres (Feb 18th 2011), he has the most losses in the league, and least wins (minus Vegas). Under his ownership, we have been the worst team in the league.
"The Buffalo Sabres' reason for existence is to win the Stanley Cup. We will aspire to be the best in the league at finding, developing and keeping players in the Buffalo Sabres family."
I'm good at watching the games. Where is the application form on the Sabres website? I can try out as a winger.I may be reading the quotes wrong and haven't listened to the interview, but did Terry justify Jason's GM chops and Phil's coaching chops with the fact that Jason played and won WJC golds, and Phil was a good player?
This guy can't be the guy picking our management
Just hire competent people to run the teams and then let them. That’s all.
We cant relieve them of all criticism. I support the hires they've made for the Bills, but they absolutely deserve criticism for the Sabres debacle. They were the ones who hired Botts and Murray, and it's been a ripple effect of shit since those buffoons took over.Oh brother.
Yeah, I wish they’d go back to the Golisano days when our two best players walked out on the same day because we were too cheap to sign them.
The owner isn’t the problem.
Just hire competent people to run the teams and then let them. That’s all.
We cant relieve them of all criticism. I support the hires they've made for the Bills, but they absolutely deserve criticism for the Sabres debacle. They were the ones who hired Botts and Murray, and it's been a ripple effect of **** since those buffoons took over.
People should be careful what they wish for.
Im not even from the US let alone Buffalo - but if it wasn't for the Pegula ownership one or both teams might not be in Buffalo anymore...
To answer the OP - I think they ate fine owning both teams. They just need to have a management structure in place for both teams - with one person at the top for each.
Those people at the top need to be the right people & have full authority / control of the respective team operations - including hiring firing of GM/coaches /personnel etc.
We cant relieve them of all criticism. I support the hires they've made for the Bills, but they absolutely deserve criticism for the Sabres debacle. They were the ones who fired Regier and Ruff, and it's been a ripple effect of **** since those buffoons left.
Marek Zagrapan
Dennis Persson
1 player out of 10 from the 2010 draft to ever play in the NHL
1 player out of 6 from the 2011 draft to play meaningful minutes in the NHL
Yup... totally the Pegulas fault. Horrible owners.
They had a gm that tried to spend their way out of bad drafting initially, then hired a GM that tried to trade their way out of it and burnt through assets, now they hired a GM taking a draft and develop approach. (Which should have been the what the second GM did.)
They are slowly learning and at least attempting to take the right approach even though the execution hasn't been flawless. At least they aren't like Daniel Snyder who hasn't learned ****.
I have issues with them on a lot of levels but the premise of this thread is so reactionary and over the top.