Ghetty Green
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2018
- 1,392
- 1,604
Yzermans 155 point season was against prime Gretzky and peak Lemieux.
Its actuallly pathetic that Forsberg got any votes, forget that Yzerman is only winning 15-10 right now when talking about his 19988/89 season.
Yzermans 155 point season was against prime Gretzky and peak Lemieux. Yzerman had more even strength points than Gretzky and 1 less even strength point than Lemeiux that year. Yzermans power play did not have close to the help that Lemeiux did with a dman like Coffey, which made up the difference in points between the 2 of them. Yzerman was working with Chiasson on the point and the second highest scoring dman on his team was Rick Zombo with a close to career high 21 points that year. Yzerman led the league in even strength goals by 4 that year. On a worse team, Yzerman was on the ice for a lot less goals against than Mario as well
Despite the clear team advantage, Lemeiux only had one more even strength point. Yzerman won the Pearson voted by his peers over the best season Lemieux ever had and a prime Gretzky. Forsberg honestly can't come close to what Yzerman did that year.
Being that close to Gretzky and Lemeiux at their best, including winning a Pearson, is significantly more impressive than a 29 goal season with a hart trophy but losing the Pearson to a guy like Markus Naslund (who was great, but not close to who Yzerman was competing with)
And Bernie Nicholls scored 150 that year.
Why downplay the fact that Yzerman has the most points in a season by a player not named Gretzky and Lemieux?
Its actuallly pathetic that Forsberg got any votes, forget that Yzerman is only winning 15-10 right now when talking about his 19988/89 season.
Yzermans 155 point season was against prime Gretzky and peak Lemieux. Yzerman had more even strength points than Gretzky and 1 less even strength point than Lemeiux that year. Yzermans power play did not have close to the help that Lemeiux did with a dman like Coffey, which made up the difference in points between the 2 of them. Yzerman was working with Chiasson on the point and the second highest scoring dman on his team was Rick Zombo with a close to career high 21 points that year. Yzerman led the league in even strength goals by 4 that year. On a worse team, Yzerman was on the ice for a lot less goals against than Mario as well
Despite the clear team advantage, Lemeiux only had one more even strength point. Yzerman won the Pearson voted by his peers over the best season Lemieux ever had and a prime Gretzky. Forsberg honestly can't come close to what Yzerman did that year.
Being that close to Gretzky and Lemeiux at their best, including winning a Pearson, is significantly more impressive than a 29 goal season with a hart trophy but losing the Pearson to a guy like Markus Naslund (who was great, but not close to who Yzerman was competing with)
The 80s had a few Pearson head-scratchers. I think a lot of players were voting relative to expectations. I don't think anyone thought he was particularly close to Lemieux
Yeah I voted for Yzerman too - but your comparisons to Lemieux in 1989 are way too exagerated. ES this, ES that...power play production counts too. Lemieux was significantly better than Yzerman that year.
Also - the Pearson is kind of a joke in the 80s. In 1986 - Lemieux won it over Gretzky, even though Gretzky outscored him by close to 70 points. I wouldn't use Yzerman's pearson win to draw any conclusions that he was somehow better, or even close to Lemieux that year.
Vs peak Forsberg though - I agree. Better season
exactly.And Bernie Nicholls scored 150 that year.
That post wasnt me trying to say Yzerman was better than Lemieux if it came out that way. It was just that Yzerman was slugging it out with 2 of the top 4 all time and doing a really good job at it while Forsberg was doing it in a relatively weak era for forwards. Splitting awards (no matter how much you say its a joke) with Lemieux and Gretzky is significantly different than splitting them with Naslund.
Yzerman in my estimation was more impressive than Gretzky and Lemeiux at even strength that year when you take teams into account. You cant just not count PP though so youre right Lemeiux was significantly better. But even having an edge at even strength like on guys like Gretzky and Lemieux show how good Yzerman was that year. Forsberg cant touch that season, he didnt even break 30 goals at his peak
Considering the two-way play of Forsberg, and adjusting for eras the answer is clearly Forsberg. Yzerman was purely a one way player still at that point. Forsberg in 2002-03 was better.
Youre out to lunch. Forsberg and his almost 30 goals doesnt touch Yzermans peak season, adjusting for anything you want to adjust for. The closest non-Gretzky/Lemieux linemate was 45 points behind Yzerman at his best lol