Number8
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2007
- 18,169
- 17,407
Are we going to crucify him like we did voynov?
And everyone was so wrong on Voynov!
Are we going to crucify him like we did voynov?
Apparently it's "an incident involving a woman."
http://www.wkbw.com/news/police-investigating-hockey-star-patrick-kane
Does it seem more likely that the NHL said aware of the "investigation" or "aware of the rape investigation"? There's literally no benefit to using that extra word if you are the NHL.
quick everyone
let's all jump to wild conclusions before knowing the details, and endlessly speculate with our internet law degrees
Kane to the Wild? Source!?
Funny how the narrative changes with Kane where everybody is like: DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSION GUYS!!!!! but when it was Voynov and Varlamov
Funny how the narrative changes with Kane where everybody is like: DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSION GUYS!!!!! but when it was Voynov and Varlamov
Funny how the narrative changes with Kane where everybody is like: DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSION GUYS!!!!! but when it was Voynov and Varlamov
Funny how the narrative changes with Kane where everybody is like: DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSION GUYS!!!!! but when it was Voynov and Varlamov
Funny how the narrative changes with Kane where everybody is like: DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSION GUYS!!!!! but when it was Voynov and Varlamov
Deer God.
Guess those comments he made after the Cup win may be coming true.
especially when Kane has a known history of being a drunk and committing assault.
Dear Patrick,
Wanna go fishing?
Sincerely,
Mike Richards
Funny how the narrative changes with Kane where everybody is like: DON'T JUMP TO CONCLUSION GUYS!!!!! but when it was Voynov and Varlamov