great player, a nice off the ice without any troubles ever.
hups... nope
I DON'T THINK ANYONE WITH A CRIMINAL RECORD SHOULD BE IN THE HOF.
Phil Esposito did. Though Bobby Orr might have been the reason for that.It seems odd for a player to hang around a point per game every year since entering the league and then have their production take off in their late 20's.
Feel like the Toews controversy was 10 times bigger, little argument against Kane.just a great hockey player. LOL at the "controversy" of him being included in the 100 Greatest Players
Nobody argued him being therejust a great hockey player. LOL at the "controversy" of him being included in the 100 Greatest Players
Good thing Kane doesn't have one.I DON'T THINK ANYONE WITH A CRIMINAL RECORD SHOULD BE IN THE HOF.
I don’t think anyone who doesn’t know facts should be able to post on the boards, yet here you are.I DON'T THINK ANYONE WITH A CRIMINAL RECORD SHOULD BE IN THE HOF.
Nobody argued him being there
No to you! No to anyone who thinks Patrick Kane is a not a terrible jerkwad. No no no!No to what?
No, the issue is he was in before Malkin was, that is and always will be dumb. Not even that he's in that, but Toews too was just bizarre. 101st guy that has hit 1,000pts faster than Kane, yet, not good enough for a list of 100 while being one of the few great Russians to ever play the game. Kane deserves to be on that list, Toews didn't and Malkin most definitely did.just a great hockey player. LOL at the "controversy" of him being included in the 100 Greatest Players
No to you! No to anyone who thinks Patrick Kane is a not a terrible jerkwad. No no no!
To think Sam Gagner thought he was good as Patrick Kane at one point.
Not many players have a hart Lindsay art ross smythe. Great player