crazyroyal12
Registered User
What do you Avs fans project Jost as and how do you value him? just trying to see what you guys think about him.
Took a step back this season, but overall value him very high. Ive heard next captain already if/when Landy departs. Plus we still have high hopes for his on ice potential.What do you Avs fans project Jost as and how do you value him? just trying to see what you guys think about him.
What do you Avs fans project Jost as and how do you value him? just trying to see what you guys think about him.
I'd stay away the Av's best prospects for their biggest weaknesses (Jost for secondary scoring)Any way to get Tyson Jost in there for a signed EK?
Sens 1st
Jost
Timmins
for
Signed Karlsson
Its alot, but if EK is signed for $8-9 per, then it could be a win for both teams. $10+ no thanks.Any way to get Tyson Jost in there for a signed EK?
Sens 1st
Jost
Timmins
for
Signed Karlsson
Its alot, but if EK is signed for $8-9 per, then it could be a win for both teams. $10+ no thanks.
Any way to get Tyson Jost in there for a signed EK?
Sens 1st
Jost
Timmins
for
Signed Karlsson
That is the point. If he takes a sweetheart deal of some sorts so we (the Avs) can maximize the contracts that Rantanen, Jost, Makar, Timmins, Barrie, etc get then lets bring him in. If he cripples us so we have to let a ton of guys go, then nope.No offence but why even make this post? There's literally no chance Karlsson gets less than $10M.
Because it is Erik Karlsson. If you have a chance to get a player of his caliber, you do it. Points wise, sure, Barrie is close, but as an overall Dman, he isn't in EK's stratosphere. Is EK worth the $ he is going to get? That is what is arguable.I just don't see the point for the Avs. We have Barrie, who had the 2nd highest PPG among D in the league last year, and who is both younger and less expensive than Karlsson. Why are we giving up this many good young assets to try to moderately upgrade one of the positions where we already have someone really good, instead of trying to fill areas where we still have gaping holes?
Makar for sure, but Jost? Id say Rantanen, Makar, and MacDaddy only.In a similar way to when Ottawa was trading for Duchene, I will say just like how Sens fans constantly said Chabot and Colin White were untouchable. Jost and Makar are untouchable.
Very true, but Karlsson is more in the realms of Malkin if were comparing apples to oranges where Duchene is like Justin Faulk. I feel like you're willing to open the vault a bit more for a player like Karlsson if the money makes sense.It is the same situation, our top forward prospect that has not entirely established himself yet, and our top defence prospect that has not established himself in the NHL yet, only difference is it is trading for a 1D instead of the 1C that Ottawa was trying to get. plenty of other prospects that the Avs could offer same as when the shoe was on the other foot.
Avs fans are hilarious.
In a similar way to when Ottawa was trading for Duchene, I will say just like how Sens fans constantly said Chabot and Colin White were untouchable. Jost and Makar are untouchable.
To be done in offseason
Sens
Who Colorado picks 16th overall OR their 2019 pick(Avs choose)
Ottawa 2019 pick
Cale Makar
Avs
Erik Karlsson+8 year ectension
difference is you wont get Karlsson without your top assets
although there is zero legit link to the Avs so I dont get the discussion
The only joke in this thread is the franchise you cheer for....
People expect that we will give premium assets for EK when RHD is basically our strongest position. Why keep throwing us Karlsson like he is an absolute need for us when he's not. Don't get me wrong I like Karlsson very much but if he was a winger then ok I'm buying.Avs fans are hilarious.
This explain very much exactly what I am thinking too.I just don't see the point for the Avs. We have Barrie, who had the 2nd highest PPG among D in the league last year, and who is both younger and less expensive than Karlsson. Why are we giving up this many good young assets to try to moderately upgrade one of the positions where we already have someone really good, instead of trying to fill areas where we still have gaping holes?
Karlsson is miles ahead of any Avs defenseman. One "gaping hole" the Avs have is lack of a true #1 D, which Karlsson would fill.I just don't see the point for the Avs. We have Barrie, who had the 2nd highest PPG among D in the league last year, and who is both younger and less expensive than Karlsson. Why are we giving up this many good young assets to try to moderately upgrade one of the positions where we already have someone really good, instead of trying to fill areas where we still have gaping holes?
Took a step back this season, but overall value him very high. Ive heard next captain already if/when Landy departs. Plus we still have high hopes for his on ice potential.
2c behind MacKinnon would be ideal. Played on the 1PP with the big boys all season.