LeHab
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2005
- 15,957
- 6,259
Surprised that Chicago isn’t on the US list?
Yeah here is the reason, pretty much the same reason as Vancouver:
Chicago was the site of the 1994 World Cup opener but declined to be part of the U.S. bid.
Matthew McGrath, a spokesman for Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, said in March: “FIFA could not provide a basic level of certainty on some major unknowns that put our city and taxpayers at risk. The uncertainty for taxpayers, coupled with FIFA's inflexibility and unwillingness to negotiate, were clear indications that further pursuit of the bid wasn't in Chicago's best interests.”
“It is the event’s loss not to be in a world-class city like Chicago,” a spokesman for the Fire said. “We support Mayor Emanuel’s decision, which was made in the best interest of our city.”
U.S., Mexico and Canada win joint bid for 2026 World Cup; Chicago won't be a host site
Interesting to note:
To counter concerns about severe travel, the bid said teams would be placed in regional clusters. It also has proposed not one traditional opening match but three (one in each nation).
Canada does not have a suitable venue to host a real opener (+80 000 seats). Guess the triple opener would not have the same requirements as a single one.