It's just not impressive to me if you show up after something goes wrong to say you knew that would happen if you didn't offer that opinion before hand. To be fair, Toffoli himself was more than meh given the team's offensive struggles. He just didn't have a long term future with the club but if they were headed for the playoffs nobody would be complaining.
I care about asset management and the Toffoli contract was always going to be a problem.
If the team did much better, if Toffoli potted 40 goals with a healthy Jack, then re-signing him would have been even more difficult and expensive.
It’s not the end of the world to spend assets on a rental, but I didn’t see us as a true contender this year, so I wasn’t excited about having Toffoli for year and then seeing him walk either.
It seemed like an attempt to repeat the Haula/Zacha trade but that was different.
Zacha had one foot out the door and was only going to sign a 1 year deal. Haula addressed a bigger need at a harder possession to fill, center, and he was eager to stay for a lot reasons.
I know why Fitz did the Toffoli trade, I understood the logic of it, but I definitely had mixed feelings from the start.
The best trades are for RFAs, or a player with term at least.