mukluks
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2011
- 169
- 0
Disclaimer - this is not a reaction to losing one game, rather my take on the team's trajectory over the last several years AND the way I believe this team needs to be built going forward.
To start with a quick look at the team's performance (rank) in a few key statistical categories since the 2006/7 season. A few stats never tell the whole story but do provide indicators of performance and direction.
Season Pts GF GA PP% PK% SF SA Total
2006/7 1 10 2 21 6 1 1 42
2007/8 1 3 1 3 8 1 1 18
2008/9 3 1 21 1 25 1 2 54
2009/10 11 14 7 9 10 2 9 62
2010/11 6 2 23 5 17 2 16 71
2011/12 9 7 7 22 18 5 3 71
The total simply illustrates the team rank against the league as a total, lots of flaws in doing it this way but it does show a downward overall trend. At this season's end I would strongly suggest the total will be higher again (worse).
There are a myriad of reasons for the decline, #1 of which is it is virtually impossible to maintain the excellence the wings have over the last 20 years for ever and that success = low draft position. In addition in a capped league we do not have the luxury of buying talent.
Which brings me to my suggestion for going forward.
Given That:
1. We have the best group of prospects in the system since the 90's.
2. There does not appear to be any quick fixes (free agents/trades) to our d corp issues.
3. Our elite players are past their prime.
4. While our prospect pool is very solid there does not appear to be any truly elite players in the pipeline.
5. There is a good chance of missing the playoffs this year and next or at best squeaking in and getting eliminated in the 1st/2nd round.
6. We can no longer buy our way to a good team.
7. We have some good to very good young players currently in or ready to be in the lineup.
I suggest we do the following:
1. Decide to rebuild with a goal of being an elite, cup contenting team in 4-5 years "The Goal".
2. Decide what kind of team gives us the best chance of winning and build that identity via player acquisition as well as dropping current players/prospects that do not fit that identity.
3. Identify core group of players going forward that support above goal.
4. Identify current players/prospects that can be traded for picks/players that support above goal.
5. Finish in the bottom 5-10 for the next 1-3 years by design (largely as a result of roster transition) to position team to draft the elite talent needed to accomplish above goal.
I would aim to mimic the 2007/2008 formula, which in my mind was a puck possession team that had enough "grit" to play a rougher game when need be. The caveat being that we won't have a top 5 all time dman (lidstrom) in the lineup so a premium should be placed on overall team size and speed to counteract the loss of skill.
I would keep these current roster players to support the goal;
Zetterberg, Flip, Helm, Tootoo, Abs, Kronwall, Ericsson, Smith, Howard
I would trade these current roster players to support the goal (good return)
Datsyuk, Franzen,
I would trade, buyout, demote or keep as placeholders these current roster players to support the goal (low return if anything)
Everyone else
Prospects would be kept or traded as needed, but there appears to be a good depth of forwards and dmen without any clear #1 forwards or dmen. Mrazek looks like a #1 goalie.
This results in a 2013/14 Lineup of:
Nyquist/Z/Trade,FA (Horton, Perry or preferably younger top six via trade)
Flip/Jarnkrok/Tatar
Trade,FA/Helm/Tootoo (Preferably big body, defense first 3rd line staple)
Abs/Sheahan/Ferraro
Kronwall/Ericsson
Trade,FA/smith (Stay at home, defensive dman)
CC/Lashoff
Leads to Contending lineup in 2017 or so of:
Nyquist/Jarnkrok/? (Big goal scorer)
?/Flip/Tatar (Big goal scorer)
Z/Helm/? (Big, fast defense first)
Abs/Sheahan/Ferrro
+ any combination of current prospects that turn out, acquisitions or high future picks that are blue chip.
oullet/sproul
Backman/Jensen
kronwall/Ericsson
+ any combination of current prospects that turn out, acquisitions or high future picks that are blue chip.
I am not claiming that the prospects listed in the above lineup will be good nhl'ers for sure but it is certainly a possibility. I am not attempting to rank our prospects here, just a scenario for future lineups.
If we can acquire a true #1 dman and a true top 3 forward via trade or draft I think the 2017 lineup looks very good. There are no guarantees to this of course, there is inherent risk to any strategy.
* Dats is my favourite player but also commands the best return if traded to a contender THIS year.
To start with a quick look at the team's performance (rank) in a few key statistical categories since the 2006/7 season. A few stats never tell the whole story but do provide indicators of performance and direction.
Season Pts GF GA PP% PK% SF SA Total
2006/7 1 10 2 21 6 1 1 42
2007/8 1 3 1 3 8 1 1 18
2008/9 3 1 21 1 25 1 2 54
2009/10 11 14 7 9 10 2 9 62
2010/11 6 2 23 5 17 2 16 71
2011/12 9 7 7 22 18 5 3 71
The total simply illustrates the team rank against the league as a total, lots of flaws in doing it this way but it does show a downward overall trend. At this season's end I would strongly suggest the total will be higher again (worse).
There are a myriad of reasons for the decline, #1 of which is it is virtually impossible to maintain the excellence the wings have over the last 20 years for ever and that success = low draft position. In addition in a capped league we do not have the luxury of buying talent.
Which brings me to my suggestion for going forward.
Given That:
1. We have the best group of prospects in the system since the 90's.
2. There does not appear to be any quick fixes (free agents/trades) to our d corp issues.
3. Our elite players are past their prime.
4. While our prospect pool is very solid there does not appear to be any truly elite players in the pipeline.
5. There is a good chance of missing the playoffs this year and next or at best squeaking in and getting eliminated in the 1st/2nd round.
6. We can no longer buy our way to a good team.
7. We have some good to very good young players currently in or ready to be in the lineup.
I suggest we do the following:
1. Decide to rebuild with a goal of being an elite, cup contenting team in 4-5 years "The Goal".
2. Decide what kind of team gives us the best chance of winning and build that identity via player acquisition as well as dropping current players/prospects that do not fit that identity.
3. Identify core group of players going forward that support above goal.
4. Identify current players/prospects that can be traded for picks/players that support above goal.
5. Finish in the bottom 5-10 for the next 1-3 years by design (largely as a result of roster transition) to position team to draft the elite talent needed to accomplish above goal.
I would aim to mimic the 2007/2008 formula, which in my mind was a puck possession team that had enough "grit" to play a rougher game when need be. The caveat being that we won't have a top 5 all time dman (lidstrom) in the lineup so a premium should be placed on overall team size and speed to counteract the loss of skill.
I would keep these current roster players to support the goal;
Zetterberg, Flip, Helm, Tootoo, Abs, Kronwall, Ericsson, Smith, Howard
I would trade these current roster players to support the goal (good return)
Datsyuk, Franzen,
I would trade, buyout, demote or keep as placeholders these current roster players to support the goal (low return if anything)
Everyone else
Prospects would be kept or traded as needed, but there appears to be a good depth of forwards and dmen without any clear #1 forwards or dmen. Mrazek looks like a #1 goalie.
This results in a 2013/14 Lineup of:
Nyquist/Z/Trade,FA (Horton, Perry or preferably younger top six via trade)
Flip/Jarnkrok/Tatar
Trade,FA/Helm/Tootoo (Preferably big body, defense first 3rd line staple)
Abs/Sheahan/Ferraro
Kronwall/Ericsson
Trade,FA/smith (Stay at home, defensive dman)
CC/Lashoff
Leads to Contending lineup in 2017 or so of:
Nyquist/Jarnkrok/? (Big goal scorer)
?/Flip/Tatar (Big goal scorer)
Z/Helm/? (Big, fast defense first)
Abs/Sheahan/Ferrro
+ any combination of current prospects that turn out, acquisitions or high future picks that are blue chip.
oullet/sproul
Backman/Jensen
kronwall/Ericsson
+ any combination of current prospects that turn out, acquisitions or high future picks that are blue chip.
I am not claiming that the prospects listed in the above lineup will be good nhl'ers for sure but it is certainly a possibility. I am not attempting to rank our prospects here, just a scenario for future lineups.
If we can acquire a true #1 dman and a true top 3 forward via trade or draft I think the 2017 lineup looks very good. There are no guarantees to this of course, there is inherent risk to any strategy.
* Dats is my favourite player but also commands the best return if traded to a contender THIS year.