TheBluePenguin
Registered User
Of all the Defenseman that Edmonton should be looking for, EK is not one of them.
Man, Holland is an idiot in that conversation.“Conversation”
Holland : So how much would you pay us to take EK?
Grier: We would actually want assets back.
Holland: Ok. I was just curious.
“End of Conversation”
If the Sharks are retaining AND taking on a bunch of anchor contracts with a couple years on them I assume Edmonton would have to pay an astronomical price, like Broberg, Holloway and a couple 1stThe Sharks would have to take Barrie and a couple of bad contracts (Pulju, Foegele) to make it work. Plus retain on Karlsson. Long-shot, don't see it working.
It would be interesting to see how many points Karlsson would rack up feeding McDrai & Co. and with Nurse eating the toughest defending minutes. He would look like a modern-day Paul Coffey
Holland seems to be an idiot in most cases.Man, Holland is an idiot in that conversation.
If the Sharks are retaining AND taking on a bunch of anchor contracts with a couple years on them I assume Edmonton would have to pay an astronomical price, like Broberg, Holloway and a couple 1st
That contract is just too much to take on even if we were getting him for free.
Cool. Keep EK and that awful contract all to yourselves.Man, Holland is an idiot in that conversation.
12. I don’t think it ever got to Erik Karlsson, but I do think the Oilers and Sharks had legit conversations about the revitalized defender.
Someone will pay the Sharks assets for Karlsson. Don't you worry about it. It just seems like pointless exaggeration to believe they'd have to pay to get rid of him. Like it pretty much denies all reality.Cool. Keep EK and that awful contract all to yourselves.
You always start high in negotiations and work your way to a compromise but let's say SJ retains 20-30% (2.3M - 3.4M) plus this also take on Barrie / Yamamoto, that is like 10M in dead cap for two years, plus the retention they already have going on Burns.I don’t see how Edmonton would even be able to afford Karlsson. Sharks wanted 3 first round picks and only 18% retained.
To get them to take 50% of it, and bad contracts back just to make the cap work doesn’t seem logical at all. I don’t know how they have the money let alone the assets to please San Jose
That’s what I’m saying. I don’t see how Edmonton pulls off a trade like this. Unless a third team jumps in. And they also have to be paid to help out.
Don’t see assets and money to get Karlsson
I don't think it'll require that much to get the Sharks to move Karlsson and take those cap dumps while retaining to that degree. I think they'll come down to something like two of those future assets with the cap dumps and the roughly 2 mil retention. Barrie can probably be flipped for an additional asset at next year's deadline that will cover the value gap.You always start high in negotiations and work your way to a compromise but let's say SJ retains 20-30% (2.3M - 3.4M) plus this also take on Barrie / Yamamoto, that is like 10M in dead cap for two years, plus the retention they already have going on Burns.
I think SJ could be enticed into that position but it would take a ton of picks and prospects to make it happen which is why I said Broberg + Hollway + 1sts
Grier and Holland discussed a trade involving Karlsson, but the discussions did not get to the stage where Grier would ask Karlsson if he was willing to waive his NMC.Wtf does that even mean? It never got to karlsson but they had conversations about karlsson?