Smearing a guy on the way out of town happens in a lot of places. Saying bad things about a guy that forced his way out isn't surprising at all, but having 12 people all come out with the same story? That scares the shit out of me if I'm an executive of a team looking at potentially trading for the guy.
Michael Jackson had a litany of alleged victims tack on accusations following Jimmy Arviso's family filing charges and going to court back in '05 only for all of them to fall apart under cross examination and MJ being found not guilty and cleared of all charges, including the charges in '92 with Jordan Chandler under the prior acts clause in California's criminal justice code. So I want to see how this plays out in court and how these plaintiffs do under cross examination. Will they be consistent on the stand or will they alter their story on the stand and undermine their credibility? That's what I want to see.