I'm all for trading Backlund, but we need him or someone like him in the lineup at the moment. Scratching him would be terrible for our centre depth.I think Backlund needs to take a seat. He's been nonexistent and buttery soft. Really expected more out of him.
The 3rd period was a polarizing experience from OMG this is great!!!!! to these are the suckiest sucks that ever did suck.
Jooris needs to sit another game, his giveaway to Smith directly led to the first goal.
I'm all for trading Backlund, but we need him or someone like him in the lineup at the moment. Scratching him would be terrible for our centre depth.
@ the white typeThat's kind of where I am at. I don't want Backlund off the roster for the sake of it (because that would be stupid), and really he is pretty much your ideal 3C. The problem is, I feel like we have a huge hole at our 2C because we are asking Backlund to fill that role. For that reason only, I would look at including Backlund in package to get an upgrade at 2nd line center spot.
If Backlund is moved, promote Stajan to 3C, then either play Bennett at C or call up Arnold or Granlund.
The 2C I'd target is Stamkos.
The time to trade Backlund has sailed. I was a huge advocate to trade him the last two seasons as he never showed big improvements, would always be that 30 - 40 pt #3 centerman. Everyone wanted to give him a 2nd, 3rd, 4th chance as he was never healthy. He is healthy now and still the same player. I remember i proposed a trade last year that involved Backlund and Brandon Sutter as the main pieces and it was shut down hard by most Flame fans. Looking back it may not have been such a bad idea.
He was trying to do too much.I think Jooris had a good game, tried to go through the net.
A lateral move at best IMO. I'm not fooled by his hot start with the Canucks.
I have never been a big Backlund advocate, but I think he and Sutter are on par with one another. I think Backlund is a little more offensive talent, but that is offset by his constant injuries. I think Backlund is a bit better defensively, but Sutter brings more size and physicality to the table.I remember i proposed a trade last year that involved Backlund and Brandon Sutter as the main pieces and it was shut down hard by most Flame fans. Looking back it may not have been such a bad idea.
I have never been a big Backlund advocate, but I think he and Sutter are on par with one another. I think Backlund is a little more offensive talent, but that is offset by his constant injuries. I think Backlund is a bit better defensively, but Sutter brings more size and physicality to the table.
It was originally bigger, but I couldn't find any way to upload it without it being converted to a video file.
I don't know what they are doing in Carolina to suck all the offense out of that team. It's almost like Brent Sutter was hired. They have a mere 17 goals on the year and 9 of them are from Rask, E. Staal & FaulkIf only we could of gotten J. Staal for him. He has been tearing it up with Carolina this year.
Can you upload the Gaudreau/Karlsson hit up to them laughing in the bench?
That's kind of where I am at. I don't want Backlund off the roster for the sake of it (because that would be stupid), and really he is pretty much your ideal 3C. The problem is, I feel like we have a huge hole at our 2C because we are asking Backlund to fill that role. For that reason only, I would look at including Backlund in package to get an upgrade at 2nd line center spot.
If Backlund is moved, promote Stajan to 3C, then either play Bennett at C or call up Arnold or Granlund.
The 2C I'd target is Stamkos.
I think we ride it out with Backs, with the thought/hope that Bennett takes over 2c by the end of this year or beginning of next, sliding Backlund into his perfect role, #3 shutdown.