Proposal: Nyquist and AA to Boston

[Tbaybruin]

What would it cost the Bruins for AA and Nyquist. Also how much center has AA played this year.

Click to read more...

 

[Pia8988]

AA doesn’t play center.

 

[Tbaybruin]

I see him on the lw but sources have him at center has he at all?

 

[Adityase]

Nyquist: probably a reasonable price
AA: such an unreasonable price, you would likely recoil in disgust and feel the need to respond unpleasantly

 

[Tbaybruin]

Nyquist: probably a reasonable price
AA: such an unreasonable price, you would likely recoil in disgust and feel the need to respond unpleasantly

Fair enough thanks

 

[Adityase]

Fair enough thanks

By all means though, what do you have in mind for Nyquist? I think a 2nd would have done it a month ago, but the local chatter (merited or not) is that the rebuild is going well and he might be still valuable as a 2nd line winger when this ship turns around.

 

[lilidk]

By all means though, what do you have in mind for Nyquist? I think a 2nd would have done it a month ago, but the local chatter (merited or not) is that the rebuild is going well and he might be still valuable as a 2nd line winger when this ship turns around.

I would take second for Nyquist for next four years

 

[LuckyBoeser]

I see him on the lw but sources have him at center has he at all?

I believe he have a few times this season, but he clearly better suited to play as a winger.

 

[ManwithNoIdentity]

More than you're willing to part with

By all means though, what do you have in mind for Nyquist? I think a 2nd would have done it a month ago, but the local chatter (merited or not) is that the rebuild is going well and he might be still valuable as a 2nd line winger when this ship turns around.

I think they're planning to re sign him

 

[elitepete]

Nyquist is worth a 1st+an okay prospect

 

[Tatar Shots]

Nyquist 2nd + B prospect

 

[BStinson]

Nyquist a first and AA would have to be a hockey trade involving a top 4 D to make sense.

 

[Tbaybruin]

Nyquist a first and AA would have to be a hockey trade involving a top 4 D to make sense.

Well we have a great surplus of d men both in Boston and in the system. Wonder who would work for you guys.

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

What would it cost the Bruins for AA and Nyquist. Also how much center has AA played this year.

AA is a Winger he's playing Center now that Larkin is out 1-2 weeks. And Nyquist and AA would cost you more then what you're willing to surrender. As AA isn't available unless it's massive overpayment.

 

[izlez]

Well we have a great surplus of d men both in Boston and in the system. Wonder who would work for you guys.

So, no reasonable deal can be worked out with AA in it.

Could something be worked out around Nyquist for a young defenseman? Knowing the Wings are targeting a 1st round pick for Nyquist?

 

[TCNorthstars]

So, no reasonable deal can be worked out with AA in it.

Could something be worked out around Nyquist for a young defenseman? Knowing the Wings are targeting a 1st round pick for Nyquist?

??? Someone says that it would take a top 4 D to get AA and someone else says Boston has a surplus of D. How could a reasonable deal not be reached?

 

[izlez]

Nyquist: probably a reasonable price
AA: such an unreasonable price, you would likely recoil in disgust and feel the need to respond unpleasantly

Fair enough thanks

??? Someone says that it would take a top 4 D to get AA and someone else says Boston has a surplus of D. How could a reasonable deal not be reached?

Well those same people said "no deal was to be had for AA" and "OK".
So I assumed the comment about the D being available was not for AA, and was trying to move the conversation forward.
Maybe I misinterpreted, but I don't see a reasonable discussion happening with AA for a top defenseman.

 

[TCNorthstars]

Nyquist a first and AA would have to be a hockey trade involving a top 4 D to make sense.

Well we have a great surplus of d men both in Boston and in the system. Wonder who would work for you guys.

So, no reasonable deal can be worked out with AA in it.

Could something be worked out around Nyquist for a young defenseman? Knowing the Wings are targeting a 1st round pick for Nyquist?

??? Someone says that it would take a top 4 D to get AA and someone else says Boston has a surplus of D. How could a reasonable deal not be reached?

Well those same people said "no deal was to be had for AA" and "OK".
So I assumed the comment about the D being available was not for AA, and was trying to move the conversation forward.
Maybe I misinterpreted.

If you follow the exchange it started with BStinson saying it would take a top 4 d, then TBayBruin says we have lots of D. What can be done. I think you are confusing 2 different lines of discussion or don't want to move AA for anything.

 

[newfy]

Well we have a great surplus of d men both in Boston and in the system. Wonder who would work for you guys.

AA isnt a center per se but he'll play there at times. Larkin is out for the next 2 weeks and AA is playing center. I tihnk he has value in that he can play there short term with injuries but over the course of a season hes definitely a winger first and foremost. It would take a decent package to get him I think, but Boston is a team that I could see having the pieces. Its going to cost a Frederic/Vaakaininen/JFK/Donato though. The Bruins have young center prospects and D prospects to make a trade for AA work, but hes a legit top 6 NHL winger under team control for a while.

As for Nyquist, depends on how many forwards are on the market I think but maybe a 1st, or a second and solid prospect. Not a top 5 guy but maybe tail end of the top 10. Without really looking maybe Zboril? I cant say I know many other guys in that tier for the Bruins

 

[WingsMJN2965]

Nyquist a first and AA would have to be a hockey trade involving a top 4 D to make sense.

Ask yourself if you would trade Nyquist, AA, and a 1st for Hronek or Cholowski...

 

[BStinson]

If you follow the exchange it started with BStinson saying it would take a top 4 d, then TBayBruin says we have lots of D. What can be done. I think you are confusing 2 different lines of discussion or don't want to move AA for anything.

Newfy sums it up pretty well. Some DRW are in love with the upside of AA and some aren’t so you probably are going to get wild valuation differences.

 

[BStinson]

Ask yourself if you would trade Nyquist, AA, and a 1st for Hronek or Cholowski...

I wouldn’t but I think you misread my statement I’m saying Nyquist = a 1st and I would ship AA for a Top 4. Not Nyquist, AA, and a 1st for a Top 4

 

[easton117]

Ugh, please not Nyquist. The last thing the Bruins need is another left handed winger that avoids contact like everyone out there has scabies

 

[WingsMJN2965]

I wouldn’t but I think you misread my statement I’m saying Nyquist = a 1st and I would ship AA for a Top 4. Not Nyquist, AA, and a 1st for a Top 4

Ahh, yeah, I misread it.

Sorry, my expectations of this board lowered greatly this morning when I saw the CHI-DET proposal.

 

[BStinson]

Ahh, yeah, I misread it.

Sorry, my expectations of this board lowered greatly this morning when I saw the CHI-DET proposal.

It’s all good, I still haven’t finished my morning coffee so I wouldn’t put it past me. Yeah that CHi-DET thread definitely was the worst proposal (if not Top 3) I’ve ever read on these boards.