Proposal: Nylander trade ideas

[Ashep]

Tor-Min
To Toronto:
Eriksson Ek
Greenway

To Minny:
Nylander

Tor-Ana
To Toronto:
Manson
Jones

To Anaheim:
Nylander
Dermott
2021 2nd

Tor-Fla
To Toronto:
Huberdeau

To Florida:
Nylander
2021 1st

Tor-Wash
To Toronto:
Wilson
2021 2nd

To Washington:
Nylander

Click to read more...

 

[34]

Highly unlikely Willy Nylander is moved. His ceiling sky high, 40 goal potential.

 

[AKL]

Highly unlikely Willy Nylander is moved. His ceiling sky high, 40 goal potential.

 

[The Moose is Loose]

Highly unlikely Willy Nylander is moved. His ceiling sky high, 40 goal potential.

Broken record.

X Leafs player ceiling is sky high, he could be Y.

 

[34]

He was on pace for 40 goals last season.

He scored 31 in 70 games.

 

[Big Daddy Cane]

Applying the transitive property, Eriksson Ek + Greenway = Huberdeau?

 

[Mickey Marner]

I think his value (and any high AAV contract) is in the shitter. Better to keep him.

The Wilson trade is the only one that would even interest me.

 

[East Coast Icestyle]

He was on pace for 40 goals last season.

He scored 31 in 70 games.

Thats not a 40 goal pace.

Anyways. Dont think leafs do the first two, don't think k Florida and Washington do the second ones, but Washington might consider it. Not saying Wilson is the better player, just that he's probably a better fit for them still.

 

[leeroggy]

If you are EXTREMELY lucky he'll APPROACH Huberdeau's production and Huberdeau's contract is better

Huberdeau has 170 points in his last 151 games

 

[AKL]

Applying the transitive property, Eriksson Ek + Greenway = Huberdeau?

I like it, make it happen

 

[HotDish]

Tor-Min
To Toronto:
Eriksson Ek
Greenway

To Minny:
Nylander

Interesting however, the Wild would have to make some more trades to make the cap work and because the team would be over the limit the Wild would have a hard time making a fair trade like the we saw in the Vegas-Van trade.

Plus for a team that is starving for young centre depth trading away one of them is extremely unlikely unless a centre is coming back. No I don't consider Nylander a Centre.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

It's really not laughable to say a 23 year old who had 31 goals in 68 games has the potential to hit 40

 

[Laus723]

Uh, no go on Huberdeau.

 

[kb]

37 goal pace this past year.

To the OP. How about non-Leaf fans stop trying to trade Nylander and riling up as many fanbases as possible in the process? There is a word for this.

 

[McJedi]

Applying the transitive property, Eriksson Ek + Greenway = Huberdeau?

I doubt Florida agrees.

 

[GAGLine]

He was on pace for 40 goals last season.

He scored 31 in 70 games.

You might want to check your math.

 

[WetcoastOrca]

Come on. You’re not going to get Huberdeau for Nylander. Huberdeau just put up 78 points in 69 games and has way more value.

 

[McJedi]

I’d do that deal as the Caps.

 

[GBLeaf]

Willie is great value, his contract is good value and I don't understand why anyone would want to trade him?

If there was a trade to be made to strengthen defensively and open up space on the cap, it would be Marner for me. Marner is a beauty and he's going to get better, but he's the one who would bring back real value and make some serious cap space as a result.

 

[Super Hans]

If you sort stats by the OPF (On-Pace-For) column on NHL.com, it's mostly Leafs on the top.

 

[Captain Mountain]

The first two seem bad for Toronto, so I like them.

I don't see Florida considering the 3rd and I don't see Huberdeau waiving his NMC.

The 4th makes the most sense, but I can't see either team doing it.

 

[I am Canadian]

The only deal I would consider is if the Wilson - Nylander deal.

Would have to have a top 4 RHD lined up as well to go with it in a seperate deal, etc Weegar.

Mikheyev - Matthews - Marner

Hyman - Tavares - Wilson

Vesey - Kerfoot - Simmonds

Engvall - Spezza - Barbanov

Rielly - Brodie

Muzzin - Weegar

Dermott/Lehtonen - Bogosian

100% a harder team to play against. Leafs sacrifice 15-20 goals in Nylander to Wilson but gain toughness in the top 6 & a better back end

 

[Seras]

Not trading him is a great idea

 

[seanlinden]

Not trading him is a great idea

This...

As another poster mentioned, this is not the year to shed salary and expect great value in return. The Leafs have done very well putting together a pretty complete roster for this season; and still have the flexibility to make a small defensive upgrade if the opportunity arises.

Revisit the big 4 next offseason, where there's at least another $81.5m in league-wide collective cap space becoming available.

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

First 2 trades seem pretty bad for the Leafs, last 2 trades are probably bad for the other teams