Line Combos: Nylander as a Center Discussion

ZEBROA

Registered User
Dec 21, 2017
3,699
2,258

at 1:08 you can see he been working on that D skills like forever. You can further see his sneaking skills at 2:15. And at 3:19 the media training.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crump and cyris

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
21,512
24,158
Ok. Try this on for size:

Toronto played MTL in a 7 game series. Tavares got a concussion in the first game, and never returned. Did Nylander play a lick of center the entire time Tavares was out?

I'm not even sure how that's particularly relevant. Perhaps even a coaching error... though Kerfoot and Nylander were excellent together in those playoffs.

Who played 2nd. line center?
Who produced against Montreal?
So who was 2nd. line center?

Kerfoot played C more there.... As mentioned Kerfoot and Nylander were excellent together during those playoffs. A shame Kerfoot couldn't reproduce those results.
 

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
84,403
16,503
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
I'm not even sure how that's particularly relevant. Perhaps even a coaching error... though Kerfoot and Nylander were excellent together in those playoffs.



Kerfoot played C more there.... As mentioned Kerfoot and Nylander were excellent together during those playoffs. A shame Kerfoot couldn't reproduce those results.
He produced as the 1st. line center should have.
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
21,512
24,158
He produced as the 1st. line center should have.

Yes he did, really stepped up.

That of course was when Matthews had been slashed in the wrist, requiring surgery after, and Tavares was out with a concussion.
 

IPS

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
15,763
25,319
Ok. Try this on for size:

Toronto played MTL in a 7 game series. Tavares got a concussion in the first game, and never returned. Did Nylander play a lick of center the entire time Tavares was out?
No but he was the Leafs best offensive player that series, so maybe it wasn't a good idea to mess with him that much.
 

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,152
3,351
Milton
1st line: Bertuzzi-Matthews-Marner
3rd line: Knies-Tavares-Jarnkrok

And a 2nd line of

Domi-Holmberg-Nylander
Or
Robertson-Nylander-Domi
 
Last edited:

Ianturnedbull

Registered User
Jun 11, 2022
5,121
4,620
Even though i mentioned the CBJ series, all I want to say is that Nylander is good at playing the wing. Maybe he can play center, but perhaps this is MLSE's spin on demoting Tavares or putting him on the wing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supermann_98

Buds17

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
8,380
3,468
The argument for playing Nylander at centre doesn't make much sense to me once it involves having him drop in the lineup in order to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supermann_98

PuckMagi

Registered User
Apr 13, 2013
5,461
1,968
Toronto
I think Nylander would be #1 Center on a lot of teams. I always thought he was wasted a bit on the wing... but with Matthews and Tavares on the team, I do understand the reasoning behind it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreatDayforHockey

Rielly4

Registered User
Dec 12, 2012
3,651
638
Knies-Matthews-Marner
Domi-Nylander-Bertuzzi
Robertson-Tavares-Lafferty
Jarnkrok-Kampf-Reaves
 

Skullz

Registered User
Jul 5, 2013
468
639
I love the idea, low risk/high reward. Seems like we will start Nylander at center all throughout training camp and preseason. That should let him acclimate himself more to the position, and puts him in a position to succeed, unlike that one game sample vs. CBJ.

His skating and vision is so good, so I love giving him even more ice to work with. Also helps that he and Tavares are a disaster together, and that right now we are loaded in solid wingers.

Don't mind an offensive line of something like Robertson - Nylander - Jarnkrok. They're all fast, and all of them can score.

Also, 88 will still be PP1, and go on the wing for Ozone draws when the time comes to get more ice time. Should be fine.
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
40,702
10,757
Always thought he could do it. Always thought they didn't try it because if it worked they would have to pay him 1m 2m more.

Its not like JT can play C anymore
 
  • Like
Reactions: notDatsyuk

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
74,301
40,218
Maybe he plays the wing after the faceoff but he is literally in the top 5 faceoff percentage in the NHL. Why on earth would they move that to the wing.

When they did it last year at least it was for ROR
I'm sure he would still take draws when necessary. It's all the other responsibilities a Center has that has caught up to Tavares.
 

PuckMagi

Registered User
Apr 13, 2013
5,461
1,968
Toronto
my other idea was to go with 10 forwards and 8 defense... or 11 forwards and 7 defense.

Have Matthews - Tavares - Nylander down the middle where they're all getting 20 minutes a game. The extra forward and defenders can be PK specialists who don't play many minutes, so they're always fresh and ready to go on the PK.

I know that no one has done this with only 10 forwards... but it wasn't long ago when we ran with Orr and Mclaren who played 5 minutes a night and McClement who was the 4th line PK specialist. And since we don't really need enforcers these days, you can use them as defenders instead.
 

weems

Registered User
Jul 3, 2008
18,093
11,604
Going with the assumption that Tavares is still sticking as 2C and now Nylander will be 3C, Our lineup just looks so much deeper with this setup down the middle.

It also allows Kampf to play the 4th line C role where he should be. You run Kampf as your third line C and you really run the risk that line struggles to create much offense and if Knies is playing on the line that's a pretty big waste of his offensive upside playing with a C that really doesn't create much.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: supermann_98

kb

Registered User
Aug 28, 2009
15,294
21,750
Can't help but think this is a way to get Robertson on the roster with regular reps.

A top 9 with

Matthews
Marner
Nylander
Bertuzzi
Tavares
Knies
Domi
Robertson
Jarnkrok

Would be deadly, as we know Bertuzzi will miss time.
 

Aashir Mallik

Registered User
Apr 19, 2019
11,788
12,293
Don’t see any downside

If it works, we get a 2C who can transition Tavares to the wing in the future. Also paying 9+ for the 2C seems better than a 2RW

If it doesn’t work, he can just move back to RW. It’s not like he will forget how to play the position

I don’t expect it to work, but it’s low risk/high reward so it’s worth giving an extended look
 
  • Like
Reactions: kb

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad