Not Elliott's fault, but..

[PeterAngelo]

pfft, none of you are bigger Elliott fans than this guy.

<--

For shame.

 

[journeyman79]

Can we close this thread and start a new one called, "Elliott: the best GAA of any Blues goalie ever"?

http://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/STL/goalies.html

Also, disregarding those that only played one game, he also has the best save percentage.

That's crazy!

 

[LGB51]

Wanna bet?

I've been defending him as the should be starter since last season when we still had Halak. There's no way you're a bigger Elliot cheerleader than I

 

[2 Minute Minor]

The person I remember advocating for Elliott the most was PocketNines. I think the rest of you are posers.

 

[Dbrownss]

The person I remember advocating for Elliott the most was PocketNines. I think the rest of you are posers.

That's a big case of "I told you so"

 

[Vladys Gumption]

P9's was huge on Elliott. But I'm not surprised, because he was usually right about things.

 

[Thallis]

P9's was huge on Elliott. But I'm not surprised, because he was usually right about things.

The guy had an ocean of hockey knowledge, he was just a jerk about it.

 

[2 Minute Minor]

The guy had an ocean of hockey knowledge, he was just a jerk about it.

He probably still does, just not posting about it here any more.

 

[Thallis]

He probably still does, just not posting about it here any more.

He still does, but he used to, too.

 

[LGB51]

The person I remember advocating for Elliott the most was PocketNines. I think the rest of you are posers.

I miss P9's.

 

[Mike Liut]

I miss P9's.

Don't be surprised if he's here under a different SN

 

[Vladys Gumption]

Don't be surprised if he's here under a different SN

He's not. We would have noticed by now. His posting style is pretty unique to him.

 

[LGB51]

He's not. We would have noticed by now. His posting style is pretty unique to him.

Yeah he had a snarky smartass tone to his posting, that would give his identity away pretty quickly

 

[Yodaman]

Got a question about Elliott. I'm from Montreal and was watching a Canadians game several days ago. One of the announcers was talking about the Blues and mentioned he was talking to Hitchcock when the Blues were in Montreal (just before Elliott got injured).

He goes on to say that Hitchcock said that Allen would be taking over the No1 spot over Elliott in the coming weeks.

It just doesn't make any sense that Hitch would say that to a tv reporter. Even if he would think it, I don't think he would say it publicly. What I want to know, is there even a reason Hitch would even think that. From the stats, Elliott seemed to be doing great before he got injured.

Am I missing anything or is this reporter full of ****?

 

[Thallis]

Got a question about Elliott. I'm from Montreal and was watching a Canadians game several days ago. One of the announcers was talking about the Blues and mentioned he was talking to Hitchcock when the Blues were in Montreal (just before Elliott got injured).

He goes on to say that Hitchcock said that Allen would be taking over the No1 spot over Elliott in the coming weeks.

It just doesn't make any sense that Hitch would say that to a tv reporter. Even if he would think it, I don't think he would say it publicly. What I want to know, is there even a reason Hitch would even think that. From the stats, Elliott seemed to be doing great before he got injured.

Am I missing anything or is this reporter full of ****?

Probably the latter. We've been missing Elliott significantly since he's gone down

 

[LGB51]

Got a question about Elliott. I'm from Montreal and was watching a Canadians game several days ago. One of the announcers was talking about the Blues and mentioned he was talking to Hitchcock when the Blues were in Montreal (just before Elliott got injured).

He goes on to say that Hitchcock said that Allen would be taking over the No1 spot over Elliott in the coming weeks.

It just doesn't make any sense that Hitch would say that to a tv reporter. Even if he would think it, I don't think he would say it publicly. What I want to know, is there even a reason Hitch would even think that. From the stats, Elliott seemed to be doing great before he got injured.

Am I missing anything or is this reporter full of ****?

Well if Hitch did say that, then it completely reinforces my dwindling confidence in him. Starting to really want him gone, as I feel the game has passed him by, as far as coaching in the playoff's and making the adjustments necessary to play with Chicago/LA. Or more then likely anyone else we would encounter, sorry just almost to the point of "no confidence" with Ken Hitchcock.

 

[DeuceNine]

He's not. We would have noticed by now. His posting style is pretty unique to him.

IOW, accurate and emotionless