Value of: Noah Juulsen or Josh Brook

[Beige Van]

How about we just keep the two young prospects and see how they develop?

I knew this was going to happen if the Habs managed to exceed expectations and sneak into a wildcard spot. This year's playoffs is basically house money.

 

[Grand Admiral Thrawn]

How many more "LD to Montreal" thread do we need?

As many as it takes until Habs get that elusive #2-3 LD it seems.

 

[Grand Admiral Thrawn]

I would rather put a package in place of Juulsen another prospect or roster player and a 2nd and 3rd rounder for Fowler.

I feel Fowler will balance out our defence and really help on the PP.

Getter done MB!

 

[Mrb1p]

I'm not trading Juulsen for anything mentionned here, let alone Brook.

 

[ole ole]

Word out of Vancouver is that JB is sitting down with Edler and his agent to discuss waiving his NTC, but I would assume he has to be valued as a pure rental because I think part of the discussion is going to include a potential new contract with the Nucks on July 1st. That is pure speculation, but lets proceed with the understanding any deal for Edler is a rental. With that said - Would Juulsen be available in a TDL deal for Edler? Would Mtl be interested in Edler?

Edler to Mtl for Juulsen + Conditional pick?
Edler to Mtl for 1st + conditional pick?
Edler to Mtl for conditional 1st (becomes a 2nd if he does not resign) + prospect?

Edler to Mtl for Juulsen + Conditional pick? - NO
Edler to Mtl for 1st + conditional pick? NO
Edler to Mtl for conditional 1st (becomes a 2nd if he does not resign) + prospect? NO

 

[HuGo Sham]

Word out of Vancouver is that JB is sitting down with Edler and his agent to discuss waiving his NTC, but I would assume he has to be valued as a pure rental because I think part of the discussion is going to include a potential new contract with the Nucks on July 1st. That is pure speculation, but lets proceed with the understanding any deal for Edler is a rental. With that said - Would Juulsen be available in a TDL deal for Edler? Would Mtl be interested in Edler?

Edler to Mtl for Juulsen + Conditional pick?
Edler to Mtl for 1st + conditional pick?
Edler to Mtl for conditional 1st (becomes a 2nd if he does not resign) + prospect?

seriously? habs don't touch any of those offers. none

 

[HuGo Sham]

Kris Russell for Juulsen

gross

 

[HuGo Sham]

I would keep Brooks. He is your best defenseman prospect after all

yeah no. Romanov

 

[LuckyBoeser]

yeah no. Romanov

I value league production far more than I value tournament production

 

[HuGo Sham]

I value league production far more than I value tournament production

good for you. Romanov is playing with men in the KHL as an 18 year old. everyone who actually has a clue at the pro level sees him at worst as a 2.
I love Brook too. Neither is available and certainly not for a soon-to-be 32 y.o UFA 30 pt D man. You serious? a 1st and one off our top d prospects? lol

 

[LuckyBoeser]

good for you. Romanov is playing with men in the KHL as an 18 year old. everyone who actually has a clue at the pro level sees him at worst as a 2.
I love Brook too. Neither is available and certainly not for a soon-to-be 32 y.o UFA 30 pt D man. You serious? a 1st and one off our top d prospects? lol

I just feel Romanov is overrated. Regardless of toi, you would like to see more than 1 point in 34 games.

Also I'm not proposing any Edler trades in this thread. Talk to the other guy about that.

 

[Just Linda]

yeah no. Romanov

Yeah no. Romanov is the hot ticket but Brook has sustained success and is far closer to being NHL ready.

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

Petry + 2nd for Hughes

Feel free to ignore

Feel free to

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

Kronwall or Ericsson for Juulsen. There i did my part.

 

[GSP2018]

What? How is that a clueless comment?

He is NOT the Habs best prospect on D.

 

[Just Linda]

In another thread today we were discussing how close Brook was to Valimaki. Same draft year but almost a year difference in age, Brook is putting up better numbers in his 19 season than Valimaki. I'm not saying Brook is equal to Valimaki but this is how he's valued in Montreal.

Juulsen was playing top 4 minutes before he took shots to the face. That's where he's at for the Habs right now, they wouldn't let him go unless the return was a top 4 LD.

Whether or not people agree with the assessments of these guys or not, this is how the Habs see both these players. To get them from the Habs would require a young top 4 LD

 

[Just Linda]

He is NOT the Habs best prospect on D.

One good tournament does not put Romanov above Brook.

 

[DingDongCharlie]

Can he play LD? If not, that's a no-go. If so, that could be a good starting point, though the added 2nd is kinda steep for a 30yo.

Easy pass for LA then. Martinez is a quality two-way 2nd pairing defenceman who can play either side. He’s proven clutch in the playoffs too. His resume easily warrants the addition of the 2nd.

 

[LuckyBoeser]

He is NOT the Habs best prospect on D.

This.

I value league production far more than I value tournament production

One good tournament does not put Romanov above Brook.

 

[HuGo Sham]

Yeah no. Romanov is the hot ticket but Brook has sustained success and is far closer to being NHL ready.

we'll see

 

[bernmeister]

Some months ago, 4 maybe 6, I said that Rangers would be interested in Juulsen given he is RD, but can't afford to take risk due to injury unless he was cheap, or there was some other consideration involved.

we still don't have an idea on what he looks like going forward?

 

[Legend123]

Some months ago, 4 maybe 6, I said that Rangers would be interested in Juulsen given he is RD, but can't afford to take risk due to injury unless he was cheap, or there was some other consideration involved.

we still don't have an idea on what he looks like going forward?

elite top 4 shot down d man. just needs to be healthy and gain his good early season form where he was insanely good.

 

[bernmeister]

elite top 4 **** down d man. just needs to be healthy and gain his good early season form where he was insanely good.

Thanks
Still on the wary side.
Muscles, etc are one thing
Eyes can be lights out.

 

[Just Linda]

elite top 4 shot down d man. just needs to be healthy and gain his good early season form where he was insanely good.

I wouldn't use the word elite and Juulsen together. Good, yes. Elite, heck no.

 

[HOPE]

good for you. Romanov is playing with men in the KHL as an 18 year old. everyone who actually has a clue at the pro level sees him at worst as a 2.
I love Brook too. Neither is available and certainly not for a soon-to-be 32 y.o UFA 30 pt D man. You serious? a 1st and one off our top d prospects? lol

jesus... Romanov's floor being a #2. pump the tire a bit... I love the kid, love his progression but calm down! i personnaly have Brook higher than Romanov, but Romanov does fill a bigger need. Both are keeper.