GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 187,540
- 39,529
The return is good. A 1st and a 3rd for an unhappy player.
Saints gave up a 4th, so they only move up like 10 spots to the 3rd. So it kind of boils down to a 1st.
The return is good. A 1st and a 3rd for an unhappy player.
https://twitter.com/oneangrymidget/s...38218601156608
"hesitant to put this out there but: 2nd part of Cooks deal involves butler & an amalgam of picks. Cooks deal shouldn't be viewed in a vacuum"
"When viewed as a whole, Cooks and picks turns into butler and picks. Details are fuzzy."
Trading the 32nd doesn't make any sense or else we would've just flipped Cooks for Butler, so I can see something like a mid round pick from this year and a 2nd/3rd round pick in 2018.
Anyways, if we can get Butler and not give up any picks in the first 3 rounds of this years draft, I'll be more then happy.
What the Patriots are doing this offseason is like the Whopper going to McDonald's.
I think the Pats will take Butler at 3,9M for one year instead of receiving a mid-round pick.
Patriots always thinking ahead. Edelman has 1 more year on his contract. He's played 8 years already for the Patriots. Has 1 more year left. He'll be 32 next year when he enters free agency.
Cooks is only signed through 2017, with the rookie option for 2018. So they really only have Cooks under control one more year than Edelman.
I don't think BB actually places a premium on the WR or RB positions in his roster makeup. I wouldn't be shocked to see Cooks only fulfill his option and then leave chasing a higher salary.
I don't think BB actually places a premium on the WR or RB positions in his roster makeup. I wouldn't be shocked to see Cooks only fulfill his option and then leave chasing a higher salary.