Hockeyholic
Registered User
toronto does not need wingers,
and good lord, jake gardner?....he was the one and only reason toronto lost game 7, why the heck would njd want him?...he is horrid
He was a big, not the only, reason for losing.
toronto does not need wingers,
and good lord, jake gardner?....he was the one and only reason toronto lost game 7, why the heck would njd want him?...he is horrid
We lost, i admit it. Funny thing is you won't find me in a Boston Bruins thread saying things like "they had a 3-1 lead and we took them to game 7!! Derp Derp"....you know why? Because we lost....and it's over. Time to think about your team going forward.
But as i said, if Leafs bashing gives you even 1 iota of happiness, then carry on.
pass from Toronto, I think we should be trading Gardiner but I'd be looking for either the roster piece that we need (top pairing RHD) or non-roster assets that are liquid enough to make a subsequent trade (picks, prospects). I doubt that we get the first one, so I'd be looking for the 2nd, as mentioned by others we don't need a winger as we finally have scoring line spaces for our kids to compete for
Petry isn't a top pairing defender but I'd do that deal. Montreal would notGardiner to Habs for Petry?
Petry isn't a top pairing defender but I'd do that deal. Montreal would not
Petry isn't the exact piece we need but he's a good bandaid, sure I'd do thatGardiner to Habs for Petry?
Cool.. we dont need any lw.Value wise Bratt > any listed players
Ability wise Bratt > any listed players aside from marleau (we’ll see by the end of next season, one going up one going down)
But yeah, devils wouldn’t do this. Bratt really came out of nowhere and looked special at times this year, we aren’t trading a 19 year old who had a very successful rookie year for gardiner
we could use another lw. marleau, hyman, martin and johnsson isn't a great group.Cool.. we dont need any lw.
I didn't realise leafs needed another star winger. Lol.we could use another lw. marleau, hyman, martin and johnsson isn't a great group.
bratt isn't a star winger, but he would be additional depth on a weak left side.I didn't realise leafs needed another star winger. Lol.
We have depth ...bratt isn't a star winger, but he would be additional depth on a weak left side.
we do, but bratt is better than whoever is that "depth"We have depth ...
Not needed. Leafs have bigger fish to fry.we do, but bratt is better than whoever is that "depth"
Doesn't mean that talks haven't happened though.He's a free agent and I don't believe the leafs are going to re sign him. There would have been some sort of news on an extension but alas, nothing has appeared.
if talks have happened, why wouldn't it have been announced?Doesn't mean that talks haven't happened though.
Maybe people want to keep things on the down low. Not everything Has to be announced.if talks have happened, why wouldn't it have been announced?
Who cares. No take backs double stamped it no erasies.toronto does not need wingers,
and good lord, jake gardner?....he was the one and only reason toronto lost game 7, why the heck would njd want him?...he is horrid