njdevils1982
Hell Toupée!!!
The first time I ever heard anything about unsustainable shooting percentage was Petr Prucha. And that wound up being true. But I think it's been used as a line too liberally at times too, especially the last couple years - to me unsustainable is at least 5% above the norm and a level the player's never hit. I don't really know if there's an unsustainable bad shooting percentage after watching the Devils the last five years, I keep hearing they have an unsustainable bad percentage but it keeps being bad.
I don't even know how important shooting percentage is in a vaccum cause theoretically you can have a worse shooting percentage next season and score more goals if you get more pucks to the net. I mean let's say Henrique goes down to 17% next year, that's what 25-26 goals with the same amount of shots on net? But another ten shots on net = two more goals.
every time i see that name i think of this