Confirmed with Link: Nino Niederreiter (MIN) Traded for Victor Rask (CAR)

Status
Not open for further replies.

nickschultzfan

Registered User
Jan 7, 2009
11,558
908
Can the Wild buyout Rask this July? Would it be better to cut our losses now to free up the roster for JEE, Kunin, and Sturm (and save $4 million for Leopold)?

Cap Hit Calculations

SEASONINITIAL BASE SALARYINITIAL CAP HITSIGNING BONUSBUYOUT COSTPOST-BUYOUT EARNINGSSAVINGSCAP HIT (
minnesota_wild.svg
MIN)
2019-20$4,000,000$4,000,000$0$1,333,333$1,333,333$2,666,667$1,333,333
2020-21$4,000,000$4,000,000$0$1,333,333$1,333,333$2,666,667$1,333,333
2021-22$4,000,000$4,000,000$0$1,333,333$1,333,333$2,666,667$1,333,333
2022-23$0$0$0$1,333,333$1,333,333-$1,333,333$1,333,333
2023-24$0$0$0$1,333,333$1,333,333-$1,333,333$1,333,333
2024-25$0$0$0$1,333,333$1,333,333-$1,333,333$1,333,333
TOTAL$12,000,000$12,000,000$0$8,000,000$8,000,000$4,000,000$7,999,998
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

P10p

Registered User
May 15, 2012
3,025
1,440
Can the Wild buyout Rask this July? Would it be better to cut our losses now to free up the roster for JEE, Kunin, and Sturm (and save $4 million for Leopold)?

Cap Hit Calculations

SEASONINITIAL BASE SALARYINITIAL CAP HITSIGNING BONUSBUYOUT COSTPOST-BUYOUT EARNINGSSAVINGSCAP HIT (
minnesota_wild.svg
MIN)
2019-20$4,000,000$4,000,000$0$1,333,333$1,333,333$2,666,667$1,333,333
2020-21$4,000,000$4,000,000$0$1,333,333$1,333,333$2,666,667$1,333,333
2021-22$4,000,000$4,000,000$0$1,333,333$1,333,333$2,666,667$1,333,333
2022-23$0$0$0$1,333,333$1,333,333-$1,333,333$1,333,333
2023-24$0$0$0$1,333,333$1,333,333-$1,333,333$1,333,333
2024-25$0$0$0$1,333,333$1,333,333-$1,333,333$1,333,333
TOTAL$12,000,000$12,000,000$0$8,000,000$8,000,000$4,000,000$7,999,998
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

No you have to give Rask a chance to somehow salvage this trade. At least see what we have after a full offseason here and give him some games.
 

DANOZ28

Registered User
May 22, 2012
6,902
432
nearest bar MN
well i cant see fenton admitting he failed on this trade yet so im sure rask is the #4C this season. assuming koivu plays i'd rather see greenway / kunin / donato 3rd line with JEE playing #1C in iowa.
 

a79krgm

Registered User
Jul 15, 2006
1,545
372
White Bear Lake
www.northstarshockey.com
Yup. What was concerning about Nino over the past 1 1/2 years, though, was his inability to handle the puck, and making weird decisions in the D zone. In general, he seemed lost as a hockey player, and not just for a few weeks. In other words, besides not scoring, he was also not doing other thing well.
He is the very definition of a player that needed a new start. I have no problem with trading him, just with the return.

Agree. Nino was a player that needed to get the boot if you ever saw one. A big man constantly losing battles was embarrassing. It was a good opportunity for at GM to shake the team up a little.

As far as getting Rask in return? … every team has at least one bad contract. If his teammates (namely Staal, Zucker, Parise) have good seasons this year, the trade can be forgiven.
 

DANOZ28

Registered User
May 22, 2012
6,902
432
nearest bar MN
trading a 15-25G scorer for an injured 4 mill $ C hoping he recovers seems like insanity to me. i think Carolina would have bought out his contract. i cant forgive stupidity nomatter how much time passes. would i have considered trading nino & coyle? yes however the return would have been much better or i'd have kept them till trading made sense.
 

P10p

Registered User
May 15, 2012
3,025
1,440
trading a 15-25G scorer for an injured 4 mill $ C hoping he recovers seems like insanity to me. i think Carolina would have bought out his contract. i cant forgive stupidity nomatter how much time passes. would i have considered trading nino & coyle? yes however the return would have been much better or i'd have kept them till trading made sense.

The only hope is Fenton sees something in Rask that we don't. Time will tell...
 

DeagleJenkins

Registered User
Jul 17, 2018
5,320
1,331
Minnesota
trading a 15-25G scorer for an injured 4 mill $ C hoping he recovers seems like insanity to me. i think Carolina would have bought out his contract. i cant forgive stupidity nomatter how much time passes. would i have considered trading nino & coyle? yes however the return would have been much better or i'd have kept them till trading made sense.
and if both nino and coyle continued to decline and we end up buying them out or letting them walk. is that a better scenario than trading and hoping a change of scenery helps a struggling player?
 

DeagleJenkins

Registered User
Jul 17, 2018
5,320
1,331
Minnesota
He had 3.5 years left on his deal. I wasn't too worried about that after year 1.5
what does the length of his contract have to do with what I said? in 3.5 years he couldn't of sucked horribly and let walk or bought out early if he was extremely horrible and we needed out of his deal?
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,318
20,239
MinneSNOWta
what does the length of his contract have to do with what I said? in 3.5 years he couldn't of sucked horribly and let walk or bought out early if he was extremely horrible and we needed out of his deal?

If he sucked horribly, then I wouldn't really care about him walking.

I'm saying that I would've placed the likelihood of Nino sucking so bad that he'd need to be bought out as extremely low. It was much, much, much more likely that he would've been a useful player here for the duration.

The Nino trade is defensible in that we traded from a position of strength (LW) for a position of weakness (C). The trouble we ran into was that the player we traded for was the wrong player. Whatever. Sucks, but we move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad