DeagleJenkins
Registered User
maybe he actually planned for the future and compared their stats and figured a LW for a C was not a bad deal.
Positional need can only justify so much.maybe he actually planned for the future and compared their stats and figured a LW for a C was not a bad deal.
oh i know. it was the only thing i can think of as we are weak down the middle and were strong in the LW slot.Positional need can only justify so much.
SEASON | INITIAL BASE SALARY | INITIAL CAP HIT | SIGNING BONUS | BUYOUT COST | POST-BUYOUT EARNINGS | SAVINGS | CAP HIT (
|
2019-20 | $4,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $0 | $1,333,333 | $1,333,333 | $2,666,667 | $1,333,333 |
2020-21 | $4,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $0 | $1,333,333 | $1,333,333 | $2,666,667 | $1,333,333 |
2021-22 | $4,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $0 | $1,333,333 | $1,333,333 | $2,666,667 | $1,333,333 |
2022-23 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,333,333 | $1,333,333 | -$1,333,333 | $1,333,333 |
2023-24 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,333,333 | $1,333,333 | -$1,333,333 | $1,333,333 |
2024-25 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,333,333 | $1,333,333 | -$1,333,333 | $1,333,333 |
TOTAL | $12,000,000 | $12,000,000 | $0 | $8,000,000 | $8,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $7,999,998 |
Can the Wild buyout Rask this July? Would it be better to cut our losses now to free up the roster for JEE, Kunin, and Sturm (and save $4 million for Leopold)?
Cap Hit Calculations
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
SEASON INITIAL BASE SALARY INITIAL CAP HIT SIGNING BONUS BUYOUT COST POST-BUYOUT EARNINGS SAVINGS CAP HIT ( MIN)2019-20 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $1,333,333 $1,333,333 $2,666,667 $1,333,333 2020-21 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $1,333,333 $1,333,333 $2,666,667 $1,333,333 2021-22 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $1,333,333 $1,333,333 $2,666,667 $1,333,333 2022-23 $0 $0 $0 $1,333,333 $1,333,333 -$1,333,333 $1,333,333 2023-24 $0 $0 $0 $1,333,333 $1,333,333 -$1,333,333 $1,333,333 2024-25 $0 $0 $0 $1,333,333 $1,333,333 -$1,333,333 $1,333,333 TOTAL $12,000,000 $12,000,000 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 $4,000,000 $7,999,998
Yup. What was concerning about Nino over the past 1 1/2 years, though, was his inability to handle the puck, and making weird decisions in the D zone. In general, he seemed lost as a hockey player, and not just for a few weeks. In other words, besides not scoring, he was also not doing other thing well.
He is the very definition of a player that needed a new start. I have no problem with trading him, just with the return.
trading a 15-25G scorer for an injured 4 mill $ C hoping he recovers seems like insanity to me. i think Carolina would have bought out his contract. i cant forgive stupidity nomatter how much time passes. would i have considered trading nino & coyle? yes however the return would have been much better or i'd have kept them till trading made sense.
and if both nino and coyle continued to decline and we end up buying them out or letting them walk. is that a better scenario than trading and hoping a change of scenery helps a struggling player?trading a 15-25G scorer for an injured 4 mill $ C hoping he recovers seems like insanity to me. i think Carolina would have bought out his contract. i cant forgive stupidity nomatter how much time passes. would i have considered trading nino & coyle? yes however the return would have been much better or i'd have kept them till trading made sense.
I guess the or letting them walk part wasn't in that sentence?We were never going to buyout Nino.
I guess the or letting them walk part wasn't in that sentence?
what does the length of his contract have to do with what I said? in 3.5 years he couldn't of sucked horribly and let walk or bought out early if he was extremely horrible and we needed out of his deal?He had 3.5 years left on his deal. I wasn't too worried about that after year 1.5
what does the length of his contract have to do with what I said? in 3.5 years he couldn't of sucked horribly and let walk or bought out early if he was extremely horrible and we needed out of his deal?